Connecticut Inland Route and Albany - Boston Corridor (Compass Service)

shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
Advertise with us
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Fenway

Fenway

Lead Service Attendant
AU Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2022
Messages
465
Location
Boston, MA
The holy grail in this would be for New York State and Massachusetts to work out something between Pittsfield and Albany.



A long-proposed idea that could transform the landscape of Massachusetts is closer to execution than ever before.

State House News Service (SHNS) reported Tuesday that federal and state officials came to an agreement on how to create an east-west passenger rail line that would connect the eastern and western parts of the state.

SHNS reported that Gov. Charlie Baker and Richard Neal, the U.S. Representative for Massachusetts’ first district — which covers all of western Massachusetts — spoke to reporters after a meeting at Springfield’s Union Station.

They reportedly described creating a new rail authority that would extend Massachusetts rail lines to Springfield and Pittsfield.

SHNS reported that the officials said the new rail authority would be funded using recently allocated federal infrastructure funds, but did not give a timeline for the rail authority’s creation.

“The governor has made a full commitment to East-West Rail,” Neal told SHNS, calling the meeting a “historic moment.”

https://www.boston.com/news/local-n...ail:BComToday&SUBID=fd6647d6b5&AUDID=29834201
 
I wish this had existed when I lived in Boston. My wife and I would have used it all the time since we went to Springfield all the time to see her family.
 
This is good news, but I'll believe it when I see real action. Baker has been in bed with Peter Pan to block this project for years.

Don't understand why they can't just run more frequencies now.
 
bratkinson said:
Reason 1: Conrail removed the 2nd track ALB-WOR in the '90s, I think. Or was it the '80s?
Reason 2: The tracks are owned by CSX.
Click to expand...
If Conrail removed the track then it had to be in the 80's as the takeover by CSX was 1988.
As recently as the 2000's there were still Inland Route trains running to NYC via Springfield and Worcester so the capacity is still there to run more trains. I'm sure CSX would squawk anyway, maybe when and if the situation in Mobile is resolved in Amtrak's favor that would help.

Inland Route train stopping in Worcester in 2001:worcester_inland.jpg
 
First step towards new east - west Amtrak service in Massachusetts. Figured I’d start a thread for these two potential related Amtrak corridors in Massachusetts. This initial phase 1 will include siding expansion and other track improvements raising the MAS to 79 MPH from the current 60 MPH, and includes a new siding in Grafton for the interchange point between CSX and the Grafton and Upton railroad to reduce freight and passenger conflicts at this point.

https://www.masslive.com/news/2022/...springfield-and-worcester.html?outputType=amp
 
I suppose it's safe to assume this has no bearing on any restoration of checked baggage service twixt ALB and BOS.
 
To elaborate further as you can see in the postings if this CRISI grant goes forward it will enable two inland route round trips and improve trip times on the Lake Shore between Boston and Springfield. This is also a necessary first step for the later phase which includes two additional round trips that would run from Albany to Boston (bringing the total Springfield to Boston round trips to 5.)
 
lordsigma said:
To elaborate further as you can see in the postings if this CRISI grant goes forward it will enable two inland route round trips and improve trip times on the Lake Shore between Boston and Springfield. This is also a necessary first step for the later phase which includes two additional round trips that would run from Albany to Boston (bringing the total Springfield to Boston round trips to 5.)
Click to expand...
This is great news. What's your estimate of how soon I can finally go to Boston from Springfield in the morning and return in the evening?
 
AmtrakMaineiac said:
I would hope that there would be consideration of additional stops, for example Palmer and perhaps Warren, to provide more travel options for people living in Central/Western Mass. Of course adding stations would require more funding with the local communities chipping in.
Click to expand...
Palmer is almost certain to happen as there is a very loud advocacy group there that’s been pushing for a stop like crazy.
 
They aren't wrong. FRA is going to go elsewhere in state-supported services if there is no cost sharing.
 
I see the Globe editorial at some point was updated to say that, although the Legislature failed to appropriate the requested $12 million, the Healey administration found an alternate source of funding to advance the project. It doesn't say what that alternate source is or whether it adds up to the full $12 million requested.
 
I'm all in favor of passenger trains between Albany, Springfield, Worcester and Boston. But the historic Western RR of Massachusetts route, built 1837-1841, between Worcester and Palmer is extremely circuitous, making trip times on this segment that are vaguely competitive with Peter Pan buses on the Mass Pike impossible. The RR comes within 400 ft. of the Pike south of Auburn (SW suburb of Worcester). The Mass Pike alignment should be followed from here to Palmer (requiring electrification to cope with the grades). A fringe benefit would be to facilitate a new direct Worcester-Hartford route. This new inland route would bypass the Shoreline route through eastern CT and RI, allowing it to be significantly faster than the Shoreline route. Worcester, the second biggest city in New England would get its first fast, direct rail service to NYC, PHL, and WAS.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top