Future Amtrak Sleeper ideas

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

Mailliw

OBS Chief
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
745
Location
Scranton, PA
Would a fully articulated married pair of sleeping cars count as 1 car for ADA purposes? What if 1 of the cars had more than one ADA Bedroom?
 

Just-Thinking-51

Very bored and cranky pundit
AU Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
2,868
Location
USA
Would a fully articulated married pair of sleeping cars count as 1 car for ADA purposes? What if 1 of the cars had more than one ADA Bedroom?
Would a fully articulate married pair sleeping car comply? Technically yes, but not in the spirit of the regulation.

So slapping 2 sleepers together on three trucks may or may not be acceptable.

If your rail car has more than one ADA bedroom, of course your meet the minimum standards of one per sleeper.
 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
Would a fully articulate married pair sleeping car comply? Technically yes, but not in the spirit of the regulation.

So slapping 2 sleepers together on three trucks may or may not be acceptable.

If your rail car has more than one ADA bedroom, of course your meet the minimum standards of one per sleeper.
Sorry if this has already been asked / answered in this thread but is there anywhere to find the current rules?
The FRA ADA regulations as stipulated in

PART 38 - AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) ACCESSIBILITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES

is one thing. In addition to that there is the NGEC defined regulations and detailed interpretation and application of the FRA ones to specific car configuration. IIRC the 42" aisle width comes from there, not from the CFR. I am sure when NGEC specifies fully articulated Sleeping Car pairs they will specify how the FRA Regs apply to it, and most passenger carriers have signed on to being compliant with the NGEC specified interpretation, and even the FRA plays a key role in pushing service providers in that direction. Unfortunately it is much harder to get hold of the latest NGEC specifications unless you are more than just a casually interested party..
 
Last edited:

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
MODERATOR'S NOTE: A number of posts on preferences and experiences with shared or en suite restrooms and various other current sleeper configuration experiences have been moved to its own thread at:


Please post current experiences and restroom preferences related posts in that thread and leave the New Sleeper ideas thread to radical departures from current practices, like for example, non-conventional ideas of accommodation like Lie Flat seats , Slumber coaches , Capsules etc.

Thanks you for you understanding, cooperation and participation.
 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
At present Talgo 22 is mostly Glossyware. A prototype was built and apparently demonstrated to VR. It was offered to VR in Finland for Commuter Service. Finally what VR bought were essentially what we call Multi-Levels with gangway at mid level, but entry doors at the lower level, and running on standard 4 wheel trucks. After that order VR ordered double deck Sleeper trains, but not from Talgo, but from Skoda, and those also have gangways at mid level. They also ordered more multi-levels for day trains from Skoda.

I doubt anyone will seriously try to operate single axle based rolling stock on our rickety infrastructure in the US. It is bad enough in places with the regular two axle trucks.

But wonders never cease. Talgo has a chance to offer it in response to the Amtrak LD RFP, and then we'll see how it goes.
 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
A better option would probably be an Ultradome based fleet but there are apparently clearance problems with them in Chicago. May be fixable may be not?
The manufacturer of Ultradomes is no more. Its successor company which does notionally offer the Ultradome in its catalog, which is basically the Colorado Railcar catalog has no manufacturing facility. Any order it might receive will be fulfilled apparently under contract by the company which was known as American Railcar Company which mainly was in the business of leasing freight cars and repairing them. They recently reincorporated as American Industrial Transport. I doubt that any of this cast of characters would even be able to qualify.
 
Joined
May 13, 2014
Messages
725
Location
Boston & Florida
The manufacturer of Ultradomes is no more. Its successor company which does notionally offer the Ultradome in its catalog, which is basically the Colorado Railcar catalog has no manufacturing facility. Any order it might receive will be fulfilled apparently under contract by the company which was known as American Railcar Company which mainly was in the business of leasing freight cars and repairing them. They recently reincorporated as American Industrial Transport. I doubt that any of this cast of characters would even be able to qualify.
I think most people know that. No reason the concept can't be made by another manufacturer.

 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
I think most people know that. No reason the concept can't be made by another manufacturer.

Of course, anything can be manufactured. The question is how soon and for what price. The other relevant question that Amtrak has to answer is what sort of fleet composition they want going forward.

Anyway without significant funding running into many tens of millions of dollar (which is unlikely to come to pass) nothing higher than the Superliners can operate into Chicago Union Station, so this is just a theoretical discussion.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2018
Messages
3,283
Location
12 miles from Walt Disney World
At present Talgo 22 is mostly Glossyware. A prototype wqas built and apparently demonstrated to VR. It was offered to VR in Finland for Commuter Service. Finally what VR baought were essentially what we call Multi-Levels with gangway at mid level, but entry doors at the lower level, and running on standard 4 wheel trucks. After that order VR ordered double deck Sleeper trains, but not from Talgo, but from Skoda, and those also have gangways at mid level. They also ordered more multi-levels for day trains from Skoda.

I doubt anyone will seriously try to operate single axle based rolling stock on our rickety infrastructure in the US. It is bad enough in places with the regular two axle trucks.

But wonders never cease. Talgo has a chance to offer it in response to the Amtrak LD RFP, and then we'll see how it goes.
Can you elaborate on how double-axle bogies are superior to single-axle ones on rickety infrastructure? Just curious. Does it have to do with slight variations in track gauge?
 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
Can you elaborate on how double-axle bogies are superior to single-axle ones on rickety infrastructure? Just curious. Does it have to do with slight variations in track gauge?
The Physics of it is somewhat involved. However, just to get a taste of the issues involved see this discussion:

 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
36,554
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
Wow! It's like looking into the future :)
The Siemens glossy on the Novo shows lie flat seats in one of the of the end cars. But typically they are 2x1 so they won;t be cheap. They are characterized as Business Executive Class which is what full service First Class with elaborate food service is called in the latest Eurospeak.

But of course one could select narrower lie flat seats and fit 2x2, and reduce pitch enough to fit 40+ seats per car.
 

MisterUptempo

Lead Service Attendant
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
432
Location
Chicago, IL
I'm putting this info here, in hopes that others can discuss the merits of these new sleeper trains and what features should make it into new Amtrak sleepers-

Stadler to supply Norwegian long distance trains making the journey an ‘experience in itself’​

17 February 2023

NORWAY: State-owned rolling stock company Norske Tog has selected Stadler as the winner of a contract to supply 17 long distance trainsets to be branded as Flirtnex, with options for 100 more.

‘This is a big day’, said Norske Tog CEO Øystein Risan on February 17. ‘Norway has some of the most spectacular train rides in the world, and with the new long distance trains coming in 2027, everything is in place to lift the experience, the comfort, and the quality for the passengers to a whole new level.’
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The 200 km/h trainsets will have eight cars and a capacity of up to 542 passengers, with some trains having only seats and some having a mix of seats and overnight accommodation.
----------------------------------------------------------------
The trains will feature reclining seats, sleeping compartments, a bistro, family areas and luggage space.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Risan said the trainsets would be ‘flexible when it comes to space, comfort, and different type of usage’, with a range of options including reclining seats for day and night use and two and four-berth sleeping compartments. During the day, the compartments would be convertible into private seating areas for families and business travelers.
The whole story can be found here.

-These trainsets will be built off Stadler's Flirt200 platform.
-Potentially, EMU and EDMU sets will be built.
-Sleeping compartments will come in 2-bed and 4-bed flavors.
-This story declares the trains will commence revenue service in 2027. Every other source I've seen thus far says manufacture starts in 2024, testing in Norway starts in 2025, revenue service in 2026.
-First sets will be assigned to Oslo-Bergen route.
4L76qGI.jpg

Sleeper accommodations
tKMo18X.jpg

7Ps0IZK.jpg

sW3i4at.jpg

gio4c4u.jpg

Coach and Business/1st Class seating (whatever they call it)
IQl4WcG.jpg

PCvqG8C.jpg

lkR7UNn.jpg

MORE TO COME
 
Last edited:

Just-Thinking-51

Very bored and cranky pundit
AU Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
2,868
Location
USA
-These trainsets will be built off Stadler's Flirt200 platform.
-Potentially, EMU and EDMU sets will be built.
EMU, not too surprise. I just wonder if we can find the necessary distance between city’s to equip a HSR trainsets into a sleeper service.

Sleep at 175 mph to your destination.
 
Joined
May 1, 2017
Messages
917
Location
Pittsburgh, Pa.
I'm putting this info here, in hopes that others can discuss the merits of these new sleeper trains and what features should make it into new Amtrak sleepers-


The whole story can be found here.

-These trainsets will be built off Stadler's Flirt200 platform.
-Potentially, EMU and EDMU sets will be built.
-This story declares the trains will commence revenue service in 2027. Every other source I've seen thus far says manufacture starts in 2024, testing in Norway starts in 2025, revenue service in 2026.
-First sets will be assigned to Oslo-Bergen route.
4L76qGI.jpg

Sleeper accommodations
tKMo18X.jpg

7Ps0IZK.jpg

sW3i4at.jpg

gio4c4u.jpg

Coach and Business/1st Class seating (whatever they call it)
IQl4WcG.jpg

PCvqG8C.jpg

lkR7UNn.jpg

MORE TO COME

Very sharp. Definitely modern. Consider me old fashioned, I still prefer beds parallel to the window. There's nothing like laying in bed looking out the window of a moving train.
 
Joined
May 13, 2014
Messages
725
Location
Boston & Florida
Very sharp. Definitely modern. Consider me old fashioned, I still prefer beds parallel to the window. There's nothing like laying in bed looking out the window of a moving train.
I'll second that. The typical European across-the-car bed setup leaves you with a smallish window at one end and a claustrophobic long narrow room which also allows only one person to really enjoy the view. I guess for a short overnight trip, like on the Night Owl, it would be okay but not for the rest of Amtrak's more scenic longer routes.

I also hate the permanent rear facing coach seats but look . . . the cafe car has actual human-loving table seating!

P.S. Note the clever fold down "step" for reaching the top bunk. Looks a little scary actually but no reason Amtrak couldn't make a similar more substantial foldout ladder.
 
Top