ray828
Train Attendant
Does anyone know what the Lakeshore Limited consist is out of Chicago?
Thanks
Thanks
I think they are usually elephant style. I think I've only seen the train in person once (can't remember how the engines were arranged, I was 11), but nearly every video I have seen of it has the P42s elephant style.3. The P42s are usually back to back and not elephant style.
That could be. But the six times that I traveled by it or saw it pass by so far this year the engines were always back to back. That I admit does not prove anything thoughI think they are usually elephant style. I think I've only seen the train in person once (can't remember how the engines were arranged, I was 11), but nearly every video I have seen of it has the P42s elephant style.3. The P42s are usually back to back and not elephant style.
Very true. Either of us could be right. Maybe the guys in CHI and BOS alternate between elephant style and back to back just to confuse guys like us. :lol:That could be. But the six times that I traveled by it or saw it pass by so far this year the engines were always back to back. That I admit does not prove anything thoughI think they are usually elephant style. I think I've only seen the train in person once (can't remember how the engines were arranged, I was 11), but nearly every video I have seen of it has the P42s elephant style.3. The P42s are usually back to back and not elephant style.
that's when the engines are noise to back like a elephant instead of back to back.Elephant style???? What's that?
:lol: It is their way of experimenting about our behavior on AU. How would we have anything left to discuss if they did not keep changing things unpredictably? :lol:Very true. Either of us could be right. Maybe the guys in CHI and BOS alternate between elephant style and back to back just to confuse guys like us. :lol:
I would think that back-to-back is always preferable. It allows the engineer to pass between locmotives more easily and allows for much easier reversing of directions.Elephant style on our 48 trip on June 26-27.
How much reversing of directions is required in normal service on the LSL? Are the diesel engines removed at Croton-Harmon in favor of electric traction? If so, is there a wye there to turn them around? If not, at least one would need to be run in reverse. OTOH, if one of the engines from CHI takes the BOS section, then they'd need to be run elephant style from CHI, wouldn't they? Or does one of the sections reverse direction at ALB? If the latter were the case, and the locomotive from CHI continued on to BOS, then back-to-back would make more sense.I would think that back-to-back is always preferable. It allows the engineer to pass between locmotives more easily and allows for much easier reversing of directions.Elephant style on our 48 trip on June 26-27.
They are taken off at Albany for the trip to Boston, and dual mode P32ACDMs haul them the rest of the way.How much reversing of directions is required in normal service on the LSL? Are the diesel engines removed at Croton-Harmon in favor of electric traction? If so, is there a wye there to turn them around? If not, at least one would need to be run in reverse. OTOH, if one of the engines from CHI takes the BOS section, then they'd need to be run elephant style from CHI, wouldn't they? Or does one of the sections reverse direction at ALB? If the latter were the case, and the locomotive from CHI continued on to BOS, then back-to-back would make more sense.I would think that back-to-back is always preferable. It allows the engineer to pass between locmotives more easily and allows for much easier reversing of directions.Elephant style on our 48 trip on June 26-27.
In normal operation no reversing necessary.How much reversing of directions is required in normal service on the LSL? Are the diesel engines removed at Croton-Harmon in favor of electric traction? If so, is there a wye there to turn them around? If not, at least one would need to be run in reverse. OTOH, if one of the engines from CHI takes the BOS section, then they'd need to be run elephant style from CHI, wouldn't they? Or does one of the sections reverse direction at ALB? If the latter were the case, and the locomotive from CHI continued on to BOS, then back-to-back would make more sense.
Thanks. Then if post #2 is correct, I'll get plenty of exercise since I'm in the Boston sleeper.Diner-Lite car.
One must first stow one's luggage and checkin with one's sleeping car attendant no matter what. Can't board the train, except at the correct car where you belong. The attendants will keeping sending you down the platform till you reach the correct car.Thanks. Then if post #2 is correct, I'll get plenty of exercise since I'm in the Boston sleeper.Diner-Lite car.
I wonder what the procedure is? When the call in the Metro Lounge comes to board, can one first stow luggage in the sleeper, and then walk back, preferably outside on the platform, to the diner-lite for the get-together.
Yep, you'll get plenty of exercise being in the Boston sleeper. When I boarded last week, they didn't call us out of the lounge until 8:30. By the time I got on board, checked in and my stuff stowe and made my way to the dining car for the reception, the coaches were boarding which made it kind of tough to get through as people were trying to board and settle in the coach cars.Thanks. Then if post #2 is correct, I'll get plenty of exercise since I'm in the Boston sleeper.Diner-Lite car.
I wonder what the procedure is? When the call in the Metro Lounge comes to board, can one first stow luggage in the sleeper, and then walk back, preferably outside on the platform, to the diner-lite for the get-together.
I did not see them refueling the P42's in Albany on my recent 48 trip. Where do they do it? Was it before they split at trackside?Also, I forgot to mention earlier, the P42's do go to Boston, the New York half is split off and given a P32 and the P42's are refueled in Albany along with a crew change.
Dan
Enter your email address to join: