New Siemens Charger locomotive

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

Thirdrail7

Engineer
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
4,490
It has the IDOT engines 28 and 32 but it isn't likely they'll stop anywhere extra. They aren't all online at the same time.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2019
Messages
14
Location
NewYork, NY
Nice ....I hope these Siemens Sprinter engines have finely tuned K5LA horns like the F-40's and not the second generation hybrid K5LA horns....
 

Ryan

Court Jester
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
17,567
Location
Off looking for his sense of humor

Agent

Conductor
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,455
Location
Iowa
Here's a video by allaboardnv that shows how the train got moving again with a Union Pacific engine, UP 8817, in the lead. The video includes a close-up shot of the lead Charger at the Reno station.

 

Agent

Conductor
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,455
Location
Iowa
Both Chargers are returning eastward on Amtrak #6(21). MobileRailSpotterRxR caught this California Zephyr today at Sacramento, California. P42 AMTK 14 is leading now. The front of the damaged SC-44 has been covered up.

 

F900ElCapitan

Lead Service Attendant
AU Supporter
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
472
Location
Frisco, TX
Both Chargers are returning eastward on Amtrak #6(21). MobileRailSpotterRxR caught this California Zephyr today at Sacramento, California. P42 AMTK 14 is leading now. The front of the damaged SC-44 has been covered up.

Interesting! I would think dedication to the test would dictate turning the Chargers and still having 14 in reserve. Then again, this raises another question...why didn’t they just rearrange the engines after the incident to make 14 the leader and not attach the UP engine?
 

Agent

Conductor
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,455
Location
Iowa
I believe it was probably faster overall to just attach the UP engine to the front of the train.
 
Last edited:

AmtrakBlue

Engineer
Gathering Team Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
13,169
Location
Delaware
Interesting! I would think dedication to the test would dictate turning the Chargers and still having 14 in reserve. Then again, this raises another question...why didn’t they just rearrange the engines after the incident to make 14 the leader and not attach the UP engine?
Since it occurred on single track, there may not have been a siding nearby to facilitate a swap. Even on double track, where the next switch is located would need to be taken into consideration.
 

west point

Engineer
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
2,873
Location
SW ATL airport
We might suspect that the HEP connections were damaged on the Charger ? That would have precluded placing the P-42 on front until repairs completed at Emeryville ?
 

jis

Chief Dispatcher
AU Lifetime Supporter
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
29,624
Location
Space Coast, Florida, Area code 3-2-1
I am actually surprised that the front coupler brake pipes of the front SC-44 were working just fine so as to be able to attach the rescue locomotive. The collision was a glancing blow to the rear of the truck or something like that I suppose.
 

west point

Engineer
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
2,873
Location
SW ATL airport
Here Urea or Diesel exhaust fuel (DEF) is delivered to our large gasoline stations by a dedicated tanker trailer. Have not observed any truck or trailer carrying DEF and Diesel in separate compartments. If any observer has seen a truck so equipped then that distributor will get contract. Or distributor will supply two trucks ?A 5000 gallon truck for diesel and 1000 for DEF should be enough except for any route that has 3 locos ( EB in winter )
 

Agent

Conductor
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,455
Location
Iowa
Here's a couple videos from yesterday of Amtrak #6(21) with the two Chargers. Carter Rose caught it east of Lincoln, Nebraska.


Metra BNSF Rails filmed it near the end of its journey at Riverside, Illinois.

 

F900ElCapitan

Lead Service Attendant
AU Supporter
Joined
Oct 7, 2018
Messages
472
Location
Frisco, TX
The videos appeared to show 4 cars before the diner. Would there be 3 sleepers in addition to the transdorm in the dead of Winter?
Yep, along with an extra baggage car. My thoughts are they added these cars for weight to “stress” the engines a little more on the trip. When 5 was outbound in Galesburg, the first (forward) sleeper didn’t open it’s door, thus I believe it was deadheading.
 

Agent

Conductor
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,455
Location
Iowa
Here's a video by jca1995 of the southbound Auto Train, Amtrak #53(02), with the Charger IDTX 4632 in between two P40DCs.


Here's another video of this train by M. R. Newton.

 

CSXfoamer1997

OBS Chief
Joined
Dec 23, 2015
Messages
567
Here's a video by jca1995 of the southbound Auto Train, Amtrak #53(02), with the Charger IDTX 4632 in between two P40DCs.


Here's another video of this train by M. R. Newton.

I wonder why it was sandwiched rather than in the lead? One would think they'd put it in the lead for testing.
 

jrud

Service Attendant
Joined
Feb 12, 2018
Messages
143
I wonder why it was sandwiched rather than in the lead? One would think they'd put it in the lead for testing.
It’s been a while, but I think they used a similar phased approach when they were testing/introducing MARC Chargers on trains with paying passengers. First, they had a Charger as a trailing unit behind a MP36PH-3C. Then leading a MP36PH-3C. Finally, the Charger was trusted by itself. That allowed them to work out any problems systematically with lower initial risk. They were less cautious with pure test trains without paying passengers.
 
Last edited:

west point

Engineer
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
2,873
Location
SW ATL airport
My take on testing chargers is different. Only run them leading a little as possible. Instead let a P-40 or P-42 lead and take the next 20 vehicle crossing accidents. Let us save the Chargers as much as possible.
 
Top