Interesting that the entire campaign is out if nec.amtrak.com, and it incidentally includes Chicago Union Station. Looks like it is primarily an NEC thing.
Good point. So it got me thinking what else, or elsewhere, is anything "Ready to Build".
Virginia probably could build the D.C.-Richmond-Petersburg corridor even faster if they got more federal money. Include the Potomac Long Bridge in that entry. Chicago probably could get going on another CREATE anti-bottleneck project or two.
It would be great if the South of the Lake route, CHI-Porter, was ready to go. But I don't think they even have a Record of Decision, and they took down the web page that used to purport to make "progress reports". The restored and upgraded Richmond-Raleigh corridor, well, it's in line, but both Virginia and North Carolina are still busy with other work.
In Illinois, there's Stage 2 projects for the full 110-mph service, like double-tracking the rest of the way St Louis-Joliet, that may have most permits and engineering done. Joliet-CHI, I suspect, is in no way ready for any work. Michigan's Wolverines route seems mired in murk. They haven't even picked the new location for the busiest train station in the state (Ann Arbor). You'd think Washington and Oregon and California would have been planning their to-do lists, but there's not much on the table to point to.
So I'm not recalling many projects ready to build. The anti-rail and anti-spending derangement syndrome in Congress has cast a pall on planning nationwide.
Of course, Amtrak could order 500 or 600 single-level coaches to replace the current fleet, and order another 200 or 300 cars for future added frequencies or restored routes. Likewise for bi-level equipment. And locomotives.
But when the next recession hits (and one is overdue), again we won't be ready when Congress is ready to fund shovel-ready infrastructure projects.