Amtrak Train #1 Car Train Accident report

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hear you. BNSF runs a good railroad and even without knowing the specifics I know the crossing must have been safe.

The best part of the story:

"(Jack McElligot, attorney for both Amtrak and BNSF, said he could not  

address specific claims made in the lawsuit because it is still pending.  

He said he plans on "vigorously defending the case."  

"I believe the police did a thorough investigation," McElligot said. "We  

certainly did not find any evidence of wrongdoing by either BNSF or  

Amtrak that contributed to this accident.")"

Hopefully they don't just end up with a cheap settlement to get rid of them though. I know that often happens because it is cheaper than going to court over the issue. I hope McElligot does "vigourously defend the case".
 
jccollins said:
I hear you. BNSF runs a good railroad and even without knowing the specifics I know the crossing must have been safe.
The best part of the story:

"(Jack McElligot, attorney for both Amtrak and BNSF, said he could not  

address specific claims made in the lawsuit because it is still pending.  

He said he plans on "vigorously defending the case."  

"I believe the police did a thorough investigation," McElligot said. "We  

certainly did not find any evidence of wrongdoing by either BNSF or  

Amtrak that contributed to this accident.")"

Hopefully they don't just end up with a cheap settlement to get rid of them though. I know that often happens because it is cheaper than going to court over the issue. I hope McElligot does "vigourously defend the case".
Track speed for Amtrak is 70mph so he was 2 mph under the speed limit
 
Sometimes the most vigerous defense is the one that's most cost effective to the client. However, if Amtrak and BNSF want to make an example out of them then they will, and they'll have the financial resources available to do so.
 
tp49 said:
Sometimes the most vigerous defense is the one that's most cost effective to the client. However, if Amtrak and BNSF want to make an example out of them then they will, and they'll have the financial resources available to do so.
I think they will pay some money out just so they don't have to drag it out in court :angry:
 
Here is the FRA report on the story that i posted.

Selections: Railroad - Amtrak [ATK ]

State - LOUISIANA County - All

All Regions

All Causes / All Accident Types / All Track Types

Hazmat Options - None

Passenger Trains Only - Yes

Damage Amounts - All

Report Sort Sequence - Date

Date Selected - Dec, 2002

*** IMPORTANT NOTICE ***

Collisions, derailments, fires, explosions, acts of God, or other

events involving the operation of railroad on-track equipment

(standing or moving) and causing reportable damages greater than

the reporting threshold for the year in which the accident/incident

occurred must be reported using Form FRA F 6180.54.

Reportable damage includes labor costs and all other costs to repair

or replace in kind damaged on-track equipment, signals, track, track

structures, or roadbed. Reportable damage does not include the

cost of clearing a wreck, damaged lading, or environmental cleanup

costs, etc.

If the property of more than one railroad is involved in an

accident/incident, the reporting threshold is calculated by including

the damages suffered by all railroads involved. If the total exceeds

the reporting threshold, a report is required even though an

individual railroad's damages were below the threshold.

The following report lists those events that a railroad was involved

in, regardless of whether or not that railroad's operations were the

primary reason the accident occurred. This is done because all

railroads are required to report the extent of their involvement in

the accident, regardless of whether or not there is agreement as to

the cause of the accident.

A form must be completed for each consist involved in an

accident. The railroad responsible for the on-track equipment at the

time of the accident, and only that railroad, will report the consist.

In joint operations, if the railroad having track maintenance

responsibility did not also have on-track rail equipment involved, a

report containing the track information must be forwarded.

When multiple reports have been provided in connection with a

single event, these have been grouped together.

=====Accident 1 ======================================================================== =================

HIGHWAY-RAIL IMPACT on Dec 30 2002 Amtrak [ATK ] RR Report 076328

Involving PASSENGER TRAIN at 3 :49PM

Locos(Total/derailed) 3/0 in Louisiana Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. [bN Track Maintenance RR

Cars(Total/derailed) 9/0 County of IBERIA

Speed 068 Eqp Dmg $30,000 Near or in NEW IBERIA ** Passengers were on train

....................Track information....................

Main Damage $0 Milepost 0130.6 FRA Class 4 Total Casualties: 1 Deaths and 0 Injured

....Method(s) of operation ....Cause(s)....

Automatic block

Highway user inattentiveness

Track warrant control

TRAIN NO.#1 OPERATING WITH ENGS 42/21/12 AND 9 CARS STRUCK A VEHICLE TRYING TO BEAT TRAIN OVER CROSSING AT MP130.6, LA 8

8 CROSSING.

****Additional Report(s) filed by other railroads, or because of involvement of other equipment or track****

HIGHWAY-RAIL IMPACT on Dec 30 2002 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. [bN RR Report GC1202207

Involving NOT RPD OR N/A at 3 :49PM Amtrak [ATK ]

Locos(Total/derailed) 0/0 in Louisiana Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. [bN Track Maintenance RR

Cars(Total/derailed) 0/0 County of IBERIA

Speed 000 Eqp Dmg $0 Near or in NEW IBERIA

....................Track information....................

Main Damage $0 Milepost 130.6 FRA Class 5 Total Casualties: 0 Deaths and 0 Injured

....Method(s) of operation ....Cause(s)....

Highway user inattentiveness

AMTK 1 29 TRAIN CREW REPORTED THEIR TRAIN STRIKING A HIGHWAY VEHICLE AT A PROTECTED CROSSING.

======================================================================== ============================================

--GRAND TOTALS--

Retrieved 2 report(s)

For 1 accident(s) involving 3 locomotives and 9 cars

Causing 1 deaths and 0 injuries

$30,000 of equipment damage

$0 of track damage

There were 0 cars carrying hazardous material

of which 0 were damaged or derailed, of these 0 had a release

Yesterday i was talking with one of the Amtrak engineers that i know that runs from NOLA to Lafayette La and he hit a truck at the same crossing.

Selections: Railroad - Amtrak [ATK ]

State - LOUISIANA County - All

All Regions

All Causes / All Accident Types / All Track Types

Hazmat Options - None

Passenger Trains Only - Yes

Damage Amounts - All

Report Sort Sequence - Date

Date Selected - Dec, 2001

*** IMPORTANT NOTICE ***

Collisions, derailments, fires, explosions, acts of God, or other

events involving the operation of railroad on-track equipment

(standing or moving) and causing reportable damages greater than

the reporting threshold for the year in which the accident/incident

occurred must be reported using Form FRA F 6180.54.

Reportable damage includes labor costs and all other costs to repair

or replace in kind damaged on-track equipment, signals, track, track

structures, or roadbed. Reportable damage does not include the

cost of clearing a wreck, damaged lading, or environmental cleanup

costs, etc.

If the property of more than one railroad is involved in an

accident/incident, the reporting threshold is calculated by including

the damages suffered by all railroads involved. If the total exceeds

the reporting threshold, a report is required even though an

individual railroad's damages were below the threshold.

The following report lists those events that a railroad was involved

in, regardless of whether or not that railroad's operations were the

primary reason the accident occurred. This is done because all

railroads are required to report the extent of their involvement in

the accident, regardless of whether or not there is agreement as to

the cause of the accident.

A form must be completed for each consist involved in an

accident. The railroad responsible for the on-track equipment at the

time of the accident, and only that railroad, will report the consist.

In joint operations, if the railroad having track maintenance

responsibility did not also have on-track rail equipment involved, a

report containing the track information must be forwarded.

When multiple reports have been provided in connection with a

single event, these have been grouped together.

=====Accident 1 ================================================================================

========

HIGHWAY-RAIL IMPACT on Dec 15 2001 Amtrak [ATK ] RR Report 071467

Involving PASSENGER TRAIN at 1 :50AM

Locos(Total/derailed) 2/0 in Louisiana Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. [bN Track Maintenance RR

Cars(Total/derailed) 13/0 County of IBERIA

Speed 071 Eqp Dmg $33,969 Near or in NEW IBERIA ** Passengers were on train

....................Track information....................

Main Damage $0 Milepost 0131.6 FRA Class 4 Total Casualties: 0 Deaths and 0 Injured

....Method(s) of operation ....Cause(s)....

Track warrant control

Highway user inattentiveness

TRAIN NO.#2 WITH ENGS 3/8 AND 13 CARS STRUCK A SEMI TRACTOR-TRAILER TRUCK AT MP131.36, COTEAU RD CROSSING CAUSING DAMAGE

TO UNIT NO.#3

****Additional Report(s) filed by other railroads, or because of involvement of other equipment or track****

HIGHWAY-RAIL IMPACT on Dec 15 2001 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. [bN RR Report GC1201201

Involving NOT RPD OR N/A at 1 :50AM Amtrak [ATK ]

Locos(Total/derailed) 0/0 in Louisiana Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. [bN Track Maintenance RR

Cars(Total/derailed) 0/0 County of IBERIA

Speed 000 Eqp Dmg $0 Near or in CADE

....................Track information....................

Main Damage $0 Milepost 130.6 FRA Class 5 Total Casualties: 0 Deaths and 0 Injured

....Method(s) of operation ....Cause(s)....

Highway user misjudgement under normal weather and traffic conditions

AMTK 2-1-14 REPORTS STRIKING 18 WHEEL SEMI-TRUCK AT A PROTECTED CROSSING NEAR CADE, LA.

================================================================================

===================================

--GRAND TOTALS--

Retrieved 2 report(s)

For 1 accident(s) involving 2 locomotives and 13 cars

Causing 0 deaths and 0 injuries

$33,969 of equipment damage

$0 of track damage

There were 0 cars carrying hazardous material

of which 0 were damaged or derailed, of these 0 had a release
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top