Are truck drivers under qualified?

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
From the incidents I've seen many do seem under-qualified but are hired anyway and remain employed even after close calls. Eventually their time runs out but by then it's too late. Working around commercial truckers is what convinced me that self-driving vehicles may be a genuine improvement.
 
So many of them these days are poor drivers - as bad as those driving cars. So things I have seeing in the last few years much more often:

  • Failure to signal lane changes
  • Driving in no-truck lanes
  • Not keeping in the right hand lane so cars pass on the right
  • Cutting off other drivers
  • Unable to pass because of hills or not enough power but trying to do so for miles on end causing backups behind them
Definitely much worse than in the old days when truckers were the best of the drivers.
 
So many of them these days are poor drivers - as bad as those driving cars. So things I have seeing in the last few years much more often:

  • Failure to signal lane changes
  • Driving in no-truck lanes
  • Not keeping in the right hand lane so cars pass on the right
  • Cutting off other drivers
  • Unable to pass because of hills or not enough power but trying to do so for miles on end causing backups behind them
Definitely much worse than in the old days when truckers were the best of the drivers.
In the old days they were probably paid better.
 
Remember half of all drivers are worse than average.



But... The same is true of any profession. Most occupational skills are on a bell curve, most people are close to the middle. Most of the drivers with worse than average skill are just a little worse, and most better-than-average drivers are only slightly better than average. Extremely good and extremely bad drivers are relatively rare.

The article linked in the 1st post says nothing about the accident except it occurred on I-70, 4 people were killed and the guy was driving a truck. Was he speeding or driving recklessly, or did his brakes fail? What justified the assault and attempted assault charges? Doesn't "assault" ALWAYS imply "attempted assault" and therefore charging both should be redundant? There's lots we don't know here.
 
Remember half of all drivers are worse than average.
That might be true, but way more than half are better than average. Just ask a bunch of drivers if they are better, average, or worse.

How could this be? A driver who thinks it's important to use a turn signal will use a turn signal, and figure he or she is better than those who don't. A driver who thinks it's important to obey the speed limit will obey the speed limit, and figure he or she is better than those who don't. (Substitute obey the speed limit with not exceed by more than x mph and repeat.) A driver who thinks it's important to let others pass will let others pass... You can see where this is going. With each person using self-chosen criteria, each person is above average.
 
Last edited:
That might be true, but way more than half are better than average. Just ask a bunch of drivers if they are better, average, or worse.

How could this be? A driver who thinks it's important to use a turn signal will use a turn signal, and figure he or she is better than those who don't. A driver who thinks it's important to obey the speed limit will obey the speed limit, and figure he or she is better than those who don't. (Substitute obey the speed limit with not exceed by more than x mph and repeat.) A driver who thinks it's important to let others pass will let others pass... You can see where this is going. With person using self-chosen criteria, each person is above average.
Like the children of Lake Woebegone, ALL drivers think they are above average. This doesn't make it so.
 
Remember half of all drivers are worse than average.



But... The same is true of any profession. Most occupational skills are on a bell curve, most people are close to the middle. Most of the drivers with worse than average skill are just a little worse, and most better-than-average drivers are only slightly better than average. Extremely good and extremely bad drivers are relatively rare.

The article linked in the 1st post says nothing about the accident except it occurred on I-70, 4 people were killed and the guy was driving a truck. Was he speeding or driving recklessly, or did his brakes fail? What justified the assault and attempted assault charges? Doesn't "assault" ALWAYS imply "attempted assault" and therefore charging both should be redundant? There's lots we don't know here.
I've followed this in the local media. This driver made multiple bad decisions. The runaway on the non-standard Interstate segment might have not resulted in such a big disaster had he not smashed into another accident scene.

This link summarizes and it in turn has a link to an explanation of the unique features of this segment of the Interstate. Unique features that are well-signed and that trained and/or experienced drivers cope with every day. (Also, RTD highway coaches on Rtes EV/ES/EX.)

Trucker In Fatal I-70 Pileup Pleads Not Guilty | Colorado Public Radio (cpr.org)
 
In the old days they were probably paid better.

The pay is still quite good --- good enough that at the community college where I worked pre-covid, it was impossible to get any over-the-road trucker to give up trips to teach our CDL class. There was a huge demand, a year-long waiting list to take the class, but a shortage of instructors. We owned one bus and one semi for student drivers and we could have had them on the on the road around the clock if we had the 6-8 teachers to do it. We were lucky if we got two rather than one in any given semester.)

Increasing the instructor wage to match was, of course, not an option. Heh.
 
I've followed this in the local media. This driver made multiple bad decisions. The runaway on the non-standard Interstate segment might have not resulted in such a big disaster had he not smashed into another accident scene.

This link summarizes and it in turn has a link to an explanation of the unique features of this segment of the Interstate. Unique features that are well-signed and that trained and/or experienced drivers cope with every day. (Also, RTD highway coaches on Rtes EV/ES/EX.)

Trucker In Fatal I-70 Pileup Pleads Not Guilty | Colorado Public Radio (cpr.org)
Yikes! Thanks for the links and background.
 
Yes, their driving has gotten a lot worse over the past few years. But so have their working conditions.

Just like the railroads and the airlines, the trucking industry was deregulated starting in 1980, and that was the beginning of the ugliness. Unlike the railroads and the airlines, however, the safety margins in trucking were already quite thin even before deregulation, and the working conditions were already tough. At this moment, what so many companies call the "driver shortage" in the industry is a direct consequence of working conditions having deteriorated to the point that a lot of people won't touch it. As frequently happens in jobs that are so unpleasant, most of the people left in the pipeline are not exactly the cream of the crop.
 
Brakes -Just like trains. There is that KE= 1/2 times the mass times the speed squared. When driving down- hill with runaways always stay in the lane next to the runaways. If you notice any fade immediately stop on the shoulder and wait for brakes to cool. Did that once when the load weight was much more than listed. Uphill traffic was too slow to realize that load much more than listed.
 
Remember half of all drivers are worse than average.



But... The same is true of any profession. Most occupational skills are on a bell curve, most people are close to the middle. Most of the drivers with worse than average skill are just a little worse, and most better-than-average drivers are only slightly better than average. Extremely good and extremely bad drivers are relatively rare.

The article linked in the 1st post says nothing about the accident except it occurred on I-70, 4 people were killed and the guy was driving a truck. Was he speeding or driving recklessly, or did his brakes fail? What justified the assault and attempted assault charges? Doesn't "assault" ALWAYS imply "attempted assault" and therefore charging both should be redundant? There's lots we don't know here.
I remember the day this happened. What an horrific mess. He was eastbound with a flatbed load of mostly 2x4 lumber from Vail Pass into west Denver. Claims his brakes failed (not uncommon in that area) but he failed to use (if remember correctly) four emergency run-off ramps. I have never driving that area without seeing a couple of tractor-trailers buried in the gravel on a couple the ramps. Drivers had video of his swerving lane to lane on the way down. When the crash occurred the lumber was scattered for a couple hundred feet on and around multiple vehicles both vehicles he crashed into and others in traffic. A huge fireball erupted and with the wood engulfed I think is was like 13-15 vehicles. Also damaged an overpass above the accident scene. Luckily most of the other vehicle occupants were able to escape. But four lost their lives. Under Colorado law since there were deaths due to his willful negligence maximum sentences are mandatory for the specific charge and run consecutive not concurrent. I think he was changed with 21 counts of various infractions and convicted on 20 of them. After passing 4 maybe 3 run-off ramps he pretty much got what he deserved.
 
With far more trucks on the road now than 20 gears ago I see more drivers that don't hold their line in a lane and are riding the divider. But overall I'm comfortable around big rigs. Some highways are so hammered in the truck lane that I think its impossible to drive in for any length of time. It is frustrating to get stuck behind a truck trying to pass another truck. It always seems easy to pass a truck when you are just cruising behind a truck in his draft, you pull out around and lose the draft and you are both going the same speed, most the time with a engine governor that is holding both at the same speed. Frustration for all stuck behind.
 
There is one big problem not only for trucks but autos and airplanes. It is tires. On airplanes there is a rule that the failure of one component will be covered by another by at least 50% remaining. Well, that does not apply to airplane tires. After landing at CLT one day one right main tire blew. By time reached gate the other tire overheated, and fuse plug released air. Say goodby to 2 - 48 ply tires.

Same problem with truck tires. on a fully loaded 80k weight one tire failing on doubles the adjacent tire will often fail. Take an 80k truck down a 3 % grade or more and higher speeds than posted for your weight. Use brakes to slow brakes but they heat up also tires. Tires blow then brakes fail. Results you can guess. One reason steer tires always new tires only.

Then you have autos and especially RVs. Tire sellers will often sell tires that are not load rated to the posted max load. Before you buy replacement tires for your vehicle read the max rated load on the tire and then check what the max allowable load on each wheel. I always add 25% that my farther advised since he was in trucking all his adult life. Have to wonder how many truck drivers are taught this at Joe Blows trucking school?

Had an in-law that had a SUV rated for 6000 pounds. SUV was going to be slightly overloaded. He got new tires for a trip and when I checked tires that evening rated for less but not by much. Advice to take tires back ignored. Made it about 400 miles to Florida and all 4 tires failed. Replacements were not cheap.
 
Last edited:
I think underqualified describes almost every driver on the road. Nobody drives the way you are taught in drivers' ed, whether it be gunning it to "beat the red" (and usually you end up having to stop at the next red anyway), tailgating, or driving at excessive speed, among and so many other things. Cars kill more people under the age of 54 every year than anything else and it has gotten worse the last two years. And our culture doesn't seem to care at all. Local municipalities treat traffic violations as revenue generators instead of enforcement to change behavior and you don't even get a speeding ticket unless you are going 10+miles over.

Yeah, there are a lot of unqualified truckers on the road but they are not the only ones. How many people died the same day this truck driver killed those people because someone decided to speed, run a red light, or tailgate? We don't usually hold people accountable for what the media still largely refer to as "accidents" despite the fact they are caused by deliberate violations of traffic law and safety.
 
I think underqualified describes almost every driver on the road. Nobody drives the way you are taught in drivers' ed, whether it be gunning it to "beat the red" (and usually you end up having to stop at the next red anyway), tailgating, or driving at excessive speed, among and so many other things. Cars kill more people under the age of 54 every year than anything else and it has gotten worse the last two years. And our culture doesn't seem to care at all. Local municipalities treat traffic violations as revenue generators instead of enforcement to change behavior and you don't even get a speeding ticket unless you are going 10+miles over.

Yeah, there are a lot of unqualified truckers on the road but they are not the only ones. How many people died the same day this truck driver killed those people because someone decided to speed, run a red light, or tailgate? We don't usually hold people accountable for what the media still largely refer to as "accidents" despite the fact they are caused by deliberate violations of traffic law and safety.
This thread is about truck drivers who are paid to drive, not about our weak licensing system for ordinary drivers and their inability to drive. That has nothing to do with truckers who are supposed to be held to a higher standard because their big rigs can be far more dangerous (and can carry large hazardous cargoes) . Moreover, they are taking over more and more of what railroads used to do (with even MUCH higher requirements) with, IMHO, less trained and worse driving habits than they used to have years ago when most of them set the standard for good driving and were referred to as Knights of the Road instead of Nightmares of the Road.
 
I guess I'm curious about this image of truck drivers in the past being the great "knights of the road" excellent drivers. I think it's myth myself. My mother was in shipping for a meat packing company for years when I was a kid and she knew all the truck drivers who ran shipments to/from her plant. She was a single parent and we lived in the Southeast but my father and rest of our family lived in the Midwest so we needed to go north for summers and winter breaks. To save money my mother asked drivers to let her kids hitch rides every summer and winter for years. My brother, sister and I would all get north that way, usually separately. So from about 1982 to 1987 I rode with truckers about four times a year, sometimes more. Let me tell you, they were crazy dangerous guys back then. Excessive speeding, tailgating, taking the left "no trucks" lane, you name it. I'd say the majority of them drove like idiots. And saw themselves as the "knights of the road" but they were anything but. I also don't think they've ever been held to a higher standard.
 
I think the "Knights of the road" disappeared in the '60s.

They've been discussing this on the news recently. Some truckers are planning on boycotting Colorado.

Maybe the Governor will reduce his sentence. The judge claims he gave the required minimum sentences but the number of violations mandated the 110 year total.
 
I guess I'm curious about this image of truck drivers in the past being the great "knights of the road" excellent drivers. I think it's myth myself. My mother was in shipping for a meat packing company for years when I was a kid and she knew all the truck drivers who ran shipments to/from her plant. She was a single parent and we lived in the Southeast but my father and rest of our family lived in the Midwest so we needed to go north for summers and winter breaks. To save money my mother asked drivers to let her kids hitch rides every summer and winter for years. My brother, sister and I would all get north that way, usually separately. So from about 1982 to 1987 I rode with truckers about four times a year, sometimes more. Let me tell you, they were crazy dangerous guys back then. Excessive speeding, tailgating, taking the left "no trucks" lane, you name it. I'd say the majority of them drove like idiots. And saw themselves as the "knights of the road" but they were anything but. I also don't think they've ever been held to a higher standard.
Back in the early 1960's we were so annoyed by an overly aggressive trucker on the New Jersey Turnpike that my father reported him to the toll-taker when we exited. (No cellphones back then!) More recently, I think the issue of whether a trucker might be a bad driver or not depends on who they work for. The big companies have their trucked all hooked up to the electronic leash of GPS and such, take interest in how their drivers drive, and now have the technology to monitor them. Some of the independent owner-operators don't have this and may take on too much work that gives them stressful deadlines. I was pretty impressed that in Texas, of all places, most of the big rigs actually drove below the speed limit. Just shows you we have myths about people and places that aren't true.

The most common bad driving moves I've seen from trucker mostly involves trying to pass in heavy traffic when they don't have enough power to quickly make their move.
 
Back
Top