AmtrakerBx
Train Attendant
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Messages
- 44
UP nixes night train plan
The latest effort to restore Amtrak passenger trains to the Tehachapis has stalled in frustration after Union Pacific Railroad refused to even consider the idea, according to a January 2 report in the Bakersfield Californian.
Caltrans recently asked Union Pacific to study the possibility of running a single Amtrak train nightly between Bakersfield and Los Angeles over the 150-mile route over the Tehachapi Mountains. Union Pacific owns the tracks, and Caltrans operates Amtrak train routes in California.
The trip would have been an extension of Amtrak’s current San Joaquin route, which runs between Oakland and Bakersfield. Caltrans requested a capacity study to determine if a single passenger train could squeeze among the freight traffic on the route, and to determine what track improvements would be needed, such as new sidings that would let trains pass each other.
“We told them that it was basically a nonstarter as far as we’re concerned,” said Union Pacific spokesman John Bromley. “It just doesn’t make sense when you compare how quickly you can make the drive.”
Passenger trains have not operated between Bakersfield and Los Angeles since 1971, when Amtrak took over passenger rail service nationwide. Passenger rail travel heading south dead-ends in Bakersfield, and Amtrak passengers seeking to go farther must now board buses to reach the next active rail route.
A Caltrans study last year identified the Bakersfield-Los Angeles route as one of the two most significant rail “connectivity gaps” in Southern California.
“It’s surprising that they (Caltrans) asked,” said Alan Miller, executive director of Train Riders Association of California, or TRAC, a 1,500-member passenger advocacy group based in Sacramento.
“It has been a while since they’ve moved forward with action like this. I think they recognize the need. It’s just disappointing that they haven’t followed up yet.”
Amtrak has the authority under federal law to demand access to private freight tracks for passenger trains, but because Amtrak and Caltrans share control of passenger trains in California, it’s unclear if either agency has authority to demand that UP complete the capacity study, and neither has stepped forward to do that.
“That route is actually subsidized by the state of California, so it’s really a California issue as to whether they want to see that route expanded on to L.A.,” said Dennis Kuklis, director of planning for Amtrak West.
Caltrans spokesman John Robin Witt said neither agency has the right to demand the study.
“Rail is expanding in California, and it makes sense to look at every possible route. So we’re simply asking, is it possible now?” said Witt, a former Bakersfield resident.
The proposal called for a single nightly passenger train leaving Bakersfield at around midnight and arriving at Union Station in Los Angeles around 7:00 a.m. Barring freight traffic, the trip would take five hours, but the proposal included two hours of extra time in case of delays.
Miller said the route, though long, would appeal to casual and business travelers who want to avoid Southern California’s always-crowded highways. They could sleep aboard the train and arrive in L.A. just as the city awakens, he said.
The Tehachapi route carries 38 long freight trains a day operated by both Union Pacific and Burlington Northern & Santa Fe, said Bromley. It’s a slow, tortuous, single-track route that simply can’t handle any more traffic, especially passenger trains, he said.
“It’s just a bad mix and it’s worse on a mountain grade where there’s so much congestion,” Bromley said.
Others aren’t buying that complaint, including Rick Norris, a Palmdale city councilman and vice chairman of the San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee, a Caltrans advisory panel made up of city and county officials. A capacity study would reveal, in fact, whether present traffic loads could accommodate one short passenger train. It also would identify new sidings or other improvements needed to relieve strain on the main track, which the state would fund.
“Union Pacific has not been cooperative at this point,” Norris said.
Norris’ committee will take up the issue again when it meets January 10 in Los Angeles.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The latest effort to restore Amtrak passenger trains to the Tehachapis has stalled in frustration after Union Pacific Railroad refused to even consider the idea, according to a January 2 report in the Bakersfield Californian.
Caltrans recently asked Union Pacific to study the possibility of running a single Amtrak train nightly between Bakersfield and Los Angeles over the 150-mile route over the Tehachapi Mountains. Union Pacific owns the tracks, and Caltrans operates Amtrak train routes in California.
The trip would have been an extension of Amtrak’s current San Joaquin route, which runs between Oakland and Bakersfield. Caltrans requested a capacity study to determine if a single passenger train could squeeze among the freight traffic on the route, and to determine what track improvements would be needed, such as new sidings that would let trains pass each other.
“We told them that it was basically a nonstarter as far as we’re concerned,” said Union Pacific spokesman John Bromley. “It just doesn’t make sense when you compare how quickly you can make the drive.”
Passenger trains have not operated between Bakersfield and Los Angeles since 1971, when Amtrak took over passenger rail service nationwide. Passenger rail travel heading south dead-ends in Bakersfield, and Amtrak passengers seeking to go farther must now board buses to reach the next active rail route.
A Caltrans study last year identified the Bakersfield-Los Angeles route as one of the two most significant rail “connectivity gaps” in Southern California.
“It’s surprising that they (Caltrans) asked,” said Alan Miller, executive director of Train Riders Association of California, or TRAC, a 1,500-member passenger advocacy group based in Sacramento.
“It has been a while since they’ve moved forward with action like this. I think they recognize the need. It’s just disappointing that they haven’t followed up yet.”
Amtrak has the authority under federal law to demand access to private freight tracks for passenger trains, but because Amtrak and Caltrans share control of passenger trains in California, it’s unclear if either agency has authority to demand that UP complete the capacity study, and neither has stepped forward to do that.
“That route is actually subsidized by the state of California, so it’s really a California issue as to whether they want to see that route expanded on to L.A.,” said Dennis Kuklis, director of planning for Amtrak West.
Caltrans spokesman John Robin Witt said neither agency has the right to demand the study.
“Rail is expanding in California, and it makes sense to look at every possible route. So we’re simply asking, is it possible now?” said Witt, a former Bakersfield resident.
The proposal called for a single nightly passenger train leaving Bakersfield at around midnight and arriving at Union Station in Los Angeles around 7:00 a.m. Barring freight traffic, the trip would take five hours, but the proposal included two hours of extra time in case of delays.
Miller said the route, though long, would appeal to casual and business travelers who want to avoid Southern California’s always-crowded highways. They could sleep aboard the train and arrive in L.A. just as the city awakens, he said.
The Tehachapi route carries 38 long freight trains a day operated by both Union Pacific and Burlington Northern & Santa Fe, said Bromley. It’s a slow, tortuous, single-track route that simply can’t handle any more traffic, especially passenger trains, he said.
“It’s just a bad mix and it’s worse on a mountain grade where there’s so much congestion,” Bromley said.
Others aren’t buying that complaint, including Rick Norris, a Palmdale city councilman and vice chairman of the San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee, a Caltrans advisory panel made up of city and county officials. A capacity study would reveal, in fact, whether present traffic loads could accommodate one short passenger train. It also would identify new sidings or other improvements needed to relieve strain on the main track, which the state would fund.
“Union Pacific has not been cooperative at this point,” Norris said.
Norris’ committee will take up the issue again when it meets January 10 in Los Angeles.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------