Joel N. Weber II
Engineer
Figuring out the relative importance of global vs local harm is very important to making sound environmental decisions. For example, diesel commuter rail locomotives probably aren't all that bad in terms of global pollution relative to everything else we have in 2010, but buying new diesel locomotives today and running them for 30 years thorough 2040 may make them look terrible in terms of local pollution in 2030 if Tesla Motors ends up being wildly successful. Meanwhile, large ships using relatively dirty fuel, mostly while they're far from land, is mostly a problem in terms of global pollution and not local pollution.OTOH, with the developing "climategate" scandal coming out (indicating that much of the fear about the effects of carbon emissions on global warming may have been manufactured), does any of this really matter?