Colorado planning

Advertise with us
Shop deals on ebay
shop deals on amazon
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Willbridge said:
Larimer County's non-interest in joining RTD was because it already had a muni system in Fort Collins and subsequently one was set up in Loveland
Click to expand...
I had thought it was because they were satisfied with the intercity service provided by Colorado Motorway, at the time of RTD’s inception. The James family sold their Denver Boulder Bus Company to RTD, and shortly thereafter found a buyer for their CMW with Continental Trailways, which already ran a few trips through many of the same towns on its Denver-Wyoming routes, albeit with an intrastate traffic restriction. When Continental Trailways took it over, they began cutting service, and when it was acquired by Greyhound, even more cuts.

Today, Greyhound is down to just a single trip that way, that just serves Fort Collins on its way across Wyoming to Salt Lake City.
“Bustang” does provide multiple trips with some stops between Denver and Fort Collins…
 
railiner said:
I had thought it was because they were satisfied with the intercity service provided by Colorado Motorway, at the time of RTD’s inception. The James family sold their Denver Boulder Bus Company to RTD, and shortly thereafter found a buyer for their CMW with Continental Trailways, which already ran a few trips through many of the same towns on its Denver-Wyoming routes, albeit with an intrastate traffic restriction. When Continental Trailways took it over, they began cutting service, and when it was acquired by Greyhound, even more cuts.

Today, Greyhound is down to just a single trip that way, that just serves Fort Collins on its way across Wyoming to Salt Lake City.
“Bustang” does provide multiple trips with some stops between Denver and Fort Collins…
Click to expand...
That may have played a part, but local bus service was the main issue. The creation of RTD did include Weld County, and that's how Greeley ended up with a local bus system. The antis wanted out of the new district, but there were people in Greeley-Evans who wanted local bus service, so a threadbare system was set up. Interurban service was ignored, and Greyhound faded away to the single trip run by Express Arrow four days a week.

The local-only phenomenon comes from a political town mentality. I ran across an article in an Eastern Oregon paper from the dawn of motor buses that had merchants from Nyssa objecting to an application for a bus line between there and Ontario, because it would take folks away from local businesses. When I started at ODOT a colleague told me that he had heard the same view expressed elsewhere.


Here's the last Trailways station in Fort Collins. I was following this because some legislators were floating the idea of making RTD statewide. Colorado did not then have a DOT. Our policy was that we were against the statewide idea, but staff had to be ready in case.
1986 055.jpg
 
In recognition of the fact that start-up money might be available from new sources, and from the political recognition that unrelated complex tax measures are headed for Nov. 2024 ballots, the Front Range district's executive board has recommended holding off a vote till Nov. 2026.

https://www.cpr.org/2024/05/21/front-range-rail-vote-delayed/
 
The ColoRail newsletter is available now in pdf form at:

https://www.colorail.org/newsletter-archive

Issue #95 includes information on the General Meeting to be held in Boulder on Saturday, June 1st, and on pages 7 & 8 a wrap-up of the successful WPX season.

The General Meeting will follow up on this year's rail and transit bills.
 
Very interesting article (and some of the links were fascinating as well).

Had those rail routes held on another 5-6 years into the big 70's ski boom they might already have regular services today. There is certainly enough demand year round (certainly in summer & winter plus local/regional commuter traffic off season) for tourism traffic to have kept them going.
 
PaTrainFan said:
Interesting. I was not aware the Moffat Tunnel was state-owned.
Click to expand...
It was built and owned by the Moffat Tunnel Commission. Normally, the commissioners had short, safe, male Anglo names and were unknown to the general public. After it was paid off, new commissioners began discussing whether they had the authority to operate passenger trains. I attended one of their last meetings; last because lobbyists swung into action and the Republican legislature abolished the commission and handed the tunnel to CDOT. The Union Pacific leases the tunnel.

There was a funny consequence. In the rush, some politicians thought that CDOT (aka the Highway Department) would get to spend the reserves that the commission had built up. It turned out that the savings account had to be split up based on population in the 1920 census, which meant that Democrats in Denver got most of the money. The beautiful waterfront park north of Union Station is the result.

As an election judge I used to have to explain the commission vote to people. Only people who owned property within the Denver boundaries when the district was formed were supposed to vote. It was a headache for some, but others of us got a kick out of it.
1992 Moffat voter002.jpg1992 Moffat voter001.jpg
 
Thanks, that's amazing and led me to read the two Wikipedia pages on the matter. Reminds me of Disney's district in Florida. Also brings to mind the many semi-public entities and state agencies with their own revenue. PANYNJ must be the largest. But that's another matter.

In the case of Moffat and Disney, it does seem democratic civic engagement and awareness won out eventually? Ben Franklin would be proud?

Next time I'm in Denver I'll visit the park.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top