Nice pics, thanks for sharing! As a history buff and someone who likes old buildings etc. I find Detroit a sad,but very interesting place to visit in the daytime!
I'm so glad you enjoyed your trip. Those are beautiful pictures.I'm reviving this thread to thank everyone for the valuable information and to say I had a great time in Detroit. I went on a couple of guided tours, and happily, I was able to get some photos inside the Guardian Building. None are very good. It's really a difficult building to photograph for an amateur like me.
Downtown Detroit really is not scary. I hope to visit again to see how it continues to change.
More Detroit photos here if you are interested.
For some of us, that's the draw. There's a certain beauty in emptiness.Sadly what these pictures show is a former American city that has now died and been emptied of its residents. Please notice there are virtually no people in these pictures. You would see more activity in photos of Pyongyang than this. Just buildings and monuments but no activity. If you compare Detroit to another former industrial city like Pittsburgh (half the population and many times the success) I think you will see that it's a failed picture. Sad.
The following article from 2013 might have you singing a different tune. People do live in downtown Detroit and the occupancy rates for rentals in the area are quite high.The problem is that people come downtown for special events and then high tail it back to the burbs when they end! ( Tigers, Lions,Wings Games, Concerts etc.) No-one actually lives in the renovated Downtown Detroit close to the River and the people who work downtown ( mostly @ GM) smoke out for the burbs before dark! The rest of Detroit makes Baltimore and Buffalo seem like Paris!
Unfortunately until Detroit's financial problems are solved, and people once again move back downtown, it will continue to be a nice/sad place to visit!
Excuse me -- but "Rochester" -- former home of Eastman Kodak" -- How the mighty fallen. The school there is still pretty darn good.I read the article and frankly it sounds like boosterism and C of C propaganda! A per capita income of $20,000 is almost poverty level if you live in a City!
As I said before, the financial problems of the City, the neglect of the City and the penny pinching by the State of Michigan as well as the current Political Climate in Washington in regards to Social Programs and Infrastructure makes the prognosis for Detroit seem bleak!
No City can flourish if most of the City is poor and they surround a privileged island of wealth in the core of the city! I'm of the opinion also that there is not enough Tourists interested in visiting nor enough to attract an influx of people from other areas to move to Detroit!
In my view,(which I find sad), and many others, Detroit has seen better days and will never recover enough to be an attractive place to live and prosper! Its in the same category as Buffalo, Rochester and other faded Rust Belt Cities times two! YMMV
But Jim, the point you made that I am refuting is that no one lives in downtown Detroit. A reported 97% occupancy rate for rental units downtown as stated in the article directly refutes that argument.I read the article and frankly it sounds like boosterism and C of C propaganda! A per capita income of $20,000 is almost poverty level if you live in a City!
I take it you've never been to Paris because it is exactly as you describe in your first sentence. Wealthier inside the core and poorer in the ring around the city core. A number of other European cities are similar. What you describe seems to be the norm in a number of cities in the US and Canada (NYC, SF, Seattle, Vancouver and Toronto come to mind immediately) over the past decade plus with new luxury condo and apartment developments replacing blighted areas. I've even seen this phenomena first hand here in Sacramento.No City can flourish if most of the City is poor and they surround a privileged island of wealth in the core of the city! I'm of the opinion also that there is not enough Tourists interested in visiting nor enough to attract an influx of people from other areas to move to Detroit!
Detroit's biggest issue was one of poor leadership and corruption over the past four decades or so. One hopes that the recently elected mayor in conjunction with the bankruptcy monitor work to stabilize city government and work toward drawing new industry into the city. These things don't change overnight or even over a few nights. Getting away from their traditional auto industry and manufacturing focus would do wonders toward beginning development and increasing the job base. If I were a large company Detroit offers some attractive things for consideration, cheap land to build facilities; the University of Michigan being close by to provide an educated workforce and direct access to the Canadian marketplace via Windsor.In my view,(which I find sad), and many others, Detroit has seen better days and will never recover enough to be an attractive place to live and prosper! Its in the same category as Buffalo, Rochester and other faded Rust Belt Cities times two! YMMV
This is unfortunately really common in "company owned towns", and Detroit was a really extreme example of such, even if it was three companies. Rochester's only just beginning to recover from decades of poor leadership and corrupt government -- another company town. The underlying economic shifts were the main problem, but they get exacerbated in company towns because nobody is willing to say anything bad about The Company; for some reason that makes them especially prone to hucksters.Detroit's biggest issue was one of poor leadership and corruption over the past four decades or so.
Enter your email address to join: