SubwayNut
Conductor
The Comet has an NJ Transit logo too! Although the purple stripe is gone and it isn't their former car.
Last edited by a moderator:
No they don't. They have the three diagonal stripes but of colors that are different from those used by NJT, and the actual NJT logo is the letters NJT in a stylized form, which is not present on these cars.The Comet has an NJ Transit logo too! Although the purple stripe is gone and it isn't their former car.
The "disco stripes" are intended as a very big nod toward NJ Transit, and were no mistake. Different colors for California, but the same stripes none the less.No they don't. They have the three diagonal stripes but of colors that are different from those used by NJT, and the actual NJT logo is the letters NJT in a stylized form, which is not present on these cars.The Comet has an NJ Transit logo too! Although the purple stripe is gone and it isn't their former car.
BTW, I think Amtrak and California are also learning the hazards of trying to refurbish cars that have been out of service for a loong long time, leading to this delay in delivery.
But the disco stripes are not NJT's logo. The stylized letters NJT is. That was my point.The "disco stripes" are intended as a very big nod toward NJ Transit, and were no mistake. Different colors for California, but the same stripes none the less.No they don't. They have the three diagonal stripes but of colors that are different from those used by NJT, and the actual NJT logo is the letters NJT in a stylized form, which is not present on these cars.The Comet has an NJ Transit logo too! Although the purple stripe is gone and it isn't their former car.
BTW, I think Amtrak and California are also learning the hazards of trying to refurbish cars that have been out of service for a loong long time, leading to this delay in delivery.
I was not referring to the expertise needed or the quality of the final product at all. I was alluding to the inherent uncertainty in estimating how much work would actually be needed to refurb. You can't tell for sure until you have stripped the car down to the basics. I am sure they will come out as fine cars after somewhere between $1.7 million and $2 million per car is spent on acquiring and refurbishing them. AFAICT acquisition price was about $750K per car and refurbishment cost is in the $1 million ballpark.And perhaps they are learning those hazards, but I don't suspect Amtrak has a very large knowledge gap in this case. They've been refurbishing long-OOS equipment for quite some time. In any regard, from what I've personally seen of the results they are not doing a throw-together job. The final product is nicer than just about any of the Amfleets or Horizons for aesthetics and comfort. The only part I don't know about is ride quality, but we should have an answer on that question pretty soon.
Caltrans purchased the 14 Comet IB cars for $1.05 million, and they are paying Amtrak approximately $20 million to have the cars refurbished. That's about $1.5 million dollars per car. For reference, the 42 bi-level cars Caltrans just bought from Nippon Sharyo cost $2.71 million dollars per car.I was not referring to the expertise needed or the quality of the final product at all. I was alluding to the inherent uncertainty in estimating how much work would actually be needed to refurb. You can't tell for sure until you have stripped the car down to the basics. I am sure they will come out as fine cars after somewhere between $1.7 million and $2 million per car is spent on acquiring and refurbishing them. AFAICT acquisition price was about $750K per car and refurbishment cost is in the $1 million ballpark.
Current plan is test run for the Comets both ways, very much subject to change.Thanks! So I also assume that (as posted) the Comet cars will not be open to the public on 712 as it will still be considered a test run? Hopefully all goes well and 717 will allow the cars to have their first public debut. Sounds like this would be a good photo op!
On an aside I saw a 6-car (plus P42) Capitol Corridor train this past Sunday. I found that interesting as I'm used to seeing the 4 or 5 car train. Is this a sign of a future change (if additional cars are clear of maintenance and free for other uses) or just an operational change for the day?
Today's Bi-Level set will layover tomorrow and be back on Friday, after that, who knows?Does anyone know what happens if the test tomorrow is a success?
Will the single-level cars stay on 712/717 permanently or will the bi-level trainset be back on Friday?
I've attached the handout pictures from Caltrans.Does anyone have interior pictures of these refurbished cars? I'm sorry if I missed some in the thread. These cars better be much more comfortable than those NJT commuters with non-reclining seats.
That looks pretty nice for a Comet. Pretty much the same as an Horizon. The windows look a bit peculiar for an Amtrak, bus lokks a lot more comfortable that the California Cars.I've attached the handout pictures from Caltrans.Does anyone have interior pictures of these refurbished cars? I'm sorry if I missed some in the thread. These cars better be much more comfortable than those NJT commuters with non-reclining seats.
They've been upgraded with Amtrak's standard intercity 2x2 seating (full recline, but no foot or leg rests) and IMHO the seats are nicer than the seats on the California Cars (which don't recline).
I ride the Greyhound too, their seats are more comfortable than the ones on California Cars. Plus, they have lots of fast and cheap service on LAD-SFD and LAD-SAC.I'm more concerned about the bright lighting at 5 am on the corridor cars. This is why when I travel ground between NorCal and SoCal I often opt for the bus - at least they turn off the lights at night. I often prefer riding in the refurbished Superliners on the San Joaquin because they have dimmer lighting than the California cars.
I agree. Whenever I take the early train to the Bay Area I join the regulars in the Superliner up front. The dim light helps if you're trying to take a nap. But here's the thing... the California cars are capable of having the lights dimmed. I was once on a very delayed SJ (due to a freight derailment in Denair) and after 10:30pm the conductors dimmed the lights in every car so people could get some sleep.. people who didn't still had overhead reading lights. It would be nice if they had dim lighting hours on the early morning/late night runs.I'm more concerned about the bright lighting at 5 am on the corridor cars. This is why when I travel ground between NorCal and SoCal I often opt for the bus - at least they turn off the lights at night. I often prefer riding in the refurbished Superliners on the San Joaquin because they have dimmer lighting than the California cars.
I agree the new leather seats on the new Greyhound buses look nicer than the seats on the California cars (but I've never been on the 'hound). But the seats on these Comet IB coaches look nicer than the ones on the bus.I ride the Greyhound too, their seats are more comfortable than the ones on California Cars. Plus, they have lots of fast and cheap service on LAD-SFD and LAD-SAC.
It's cheaper to book RNO-SAC seperately, BTW.
But I'm not happy about Greyhound's large numbers of G4500 buses in California. I'm often fighting between a slow and expensive amtrak ride with transfers, or a confvenient Greyhound ride on a G4500. But at least it's better than a Megabus Van Hool.
Not trying to go off topic, this is relevent to these Comets in CA.
Problem is, California is packed with G4500 buses, which suck. So I consider California transport very poor. I like Greyhound, but not the G4500. I like Amtrak, but not the California Cars. I can ride a Comet IB, but I have to transfer for pretty much any useful trip.I agree. Whenever I take the early train to the Bay Area I join the regulars in the Superliner up front. The dim light helps if you're trying to take a nap. But here's the thing... the California cars are capable of having the lights dimmed. I was once on a very delayed SJ (due to a freight derailment in Denair) and after 10:30pm the conductors dimmed the lights in every car so people could get some sleep.. people who didn't still had overhead reading lights. It would be nice if they had dim lighting hours on the early morning/late night runs.I'm more concerned about the bright lighting at 5 am on the corridor cars. This is why when I travel ground between NorCal and SoCal I often opt for the bus - at least they turn off the lights at night. I often prefer riding in the refurbished Superliners on the San Joaquin because they have dimmer lighting than the California cars.
I agree the new leather seats on the new Greyhound buses look nicer than the seats on the California cars (but I've never been on the 'hound). But the seats on these Comet IB coaches look nicer than the ones on the bus.I ride the Greyhound too, their seats are more comfortable than the ones on California Cars. Plus, they have lots of fast and cheap service on LAD-SFD and LAD-SAC.
It's cheaper to book RNO-SAC seperately, BTW.
But I'm not happy about Greyhound's large numbers of G4500 buses in California. I'm often fighting between a slow and expensive amtrak ride with transfers, or a confvenient Greyhound ride on a G4500. But at least it's better than a Megabus Van Hool.
Not trying to go off topic, this is relevent to these Comets in CA.
I just wish Caltrans could have a consistent quality for the buses between Bakersfield and SoCal...
Enter your email address to join: