Apologies for taking this thread off topic.
Moderators, feel free to spin it off.
That's ridiculous. I'm not sure where to find figures, but I'm sure Chicago <--> Detroit has similar ridership, and they let us pick our seats. Sure, it sometimes resembles a battle scene, but they still don't make us line up for an assignment. It already takes forever to board.
(Oh god. I hope they don't get any ideas.)
Edit: Found the figures. The Wolverine had 37,951 riders in FY15 (the October monthly performance report), and the Cascades had 58,079.
Over in California the Pacific Surfliner has 224,234 monthly riders, the Capitol Corridor has 131,730 and the San Joaquin has 94,319. All have much higher ridership than the Cascades and none have conductor assigned seating.
***?? Lord talk about a CF when it comes to boarding. Not sure who came up with this idea or logic that people have to be assigned to a car and seat before boarding.
Exhibit A as to why assigned seating is a bad idea:
https://twitter.com/kilodelta/status/551030992232660992
That's a HUGE line of passengers in the waiting room of King Street Station. They aren't waiting to board the train... they are waiting to get a seat assignment, after which they will continue to wait for the boarding call, before lining up to board the train.
The argument from Amtrak's conductors is that if they can assign passengers to a certain car they can make station stops faster. If all the passengers disembarking at Tukwila are sitting in car 5, only the doors for car 5 have to be opened. Also since the card can seat a max of 37 passengers they want to be able to seat groups together. Frankly it's totally unnecessary. Conductors can use the PA to tell passengers to come to car 5 to disembark and passengers on other trains figure out how to sit together with their families (usually) without help from the conductors.