battalion51 said:
Sorry Alan bout my missing the TPA sleeper (I knoew it didn't look right). There's one thing that sets the LSL apart from Silver Service though, you need a different type of engine to go into NY. Down here in these parts it's the same stuff no matter which way you go. As far as it "Being more moves" is concerned, it's two extra throws of a switch in JAX to do this. Here's what would happen:
Combined train (let's say 87 is the JAX-ORL-MIA side and 97 is the JAX-LAK-TPA side) 87/97 pulls into JAX on track 1. Fuel up both ponies while mechanical seperates cables between the two engines and the coaches of 87 and 97. Once fueling is completed whack the lead engine (for 97) have it pull down to the 2 to 1 switch. Throw the switch, back the engine up past the switch. 87 departs. Throw the switch back to let the engine for 97 back onto Track 1. Restore the switch 1 to 1, back up, do your brake test and then depart. It's not much more complicated. Also, this way you only need two ponies to do the job instead of three. It would also require to wye the engine nightly so it's pointing in the right direction the next day. This is just a lot easier for all parties.
Traditionally, Amtrak operated its TPA section (of either train which was split at JAX at the time) over the A-line via Orlando. And the MIA section usually, operated over the S-line via Ocala and Wildwood and bypassing TPA. At one time, one of the trains operated as a full train from JAX over the A-line to Auburndale, where there it was split into its respected TPA and MIA sections!
If Amtrak would return to splitting the trains (at least at JAX), they could open up the door for better oprotunities for both Amtrak and its customer base! Badly needed direct service from ORL to TPA needs to be considered! The TPA market has traditionally been more situated on those cities which the A-line served at the time and now. The MIA market has traditionally been more situated on those cities which the S-line served at the time and now as well. But now, Amtrak has gained a viable MIA area market on the A-line, and it would be foolish to cut it (MIA service). The present location of the newer current Lakeland station, however, poses a wonderful situation for Amtrak! In my opinion it would be wise to operate the "Palmetto" over the A-line via ORL to TPA (instead of the current S-line) and continue on to MIA as it does now. Split both the "Star" and the "Meteor" at JAX, and operate the TPA sections of both trains via the A-line and the MIA sections via the S-line. Keeping in mind the location of the LAK station, it could act as a switching point for connections (providing the trains are scheduled properly) throughout the Florida rail network as all six trains (the split "Star" and "Meteor" and full "Palmetto") would have to pass here! This would allow for multiple direct departures and arrivals from ORL to TPA. Allow for daylight service on the S-line! And rerouting of the "Palmetto" would still allow the A-line to have direct ORL to MIA service! Amtrak would also be better able to gain on the local Florida markets they once had with improvements thanks to the location of the LAK station now as opposed to the old one. The Florida Rail Pass program which Amtrak intitiated would take off considerably!
For example, if a passenger wants to travel from say DeLand to Fort Lauderdale, they can either travel on the early AM departure of the "Palmetto" and go directly there via TPA, or if they desire a later departure they can travel on the "Star" (which would be the TPA section) down to LAK and switch to one of the MIA sections and continue on to FTL. This passenger has a choice of what and how they want to get there. While Amtak still offers direct daylight service on the A-line to TPA via ORL. And with daylight service on the S-line, in the event of any local (Florida) TPA service it could still be accomplished with the LAK switching point (there was/is never much market for TPA between there and JAX on the S-line, anyway)! Nobody "likes" to switch trains, however, if layovers are short and switching trains is "made" convienient, then most passengers wouldn't mind in my opinion. LAK is in the right place, right in downtown, and if trains are scheduled correctly then all business would occur here mostly during the daytime hours.
Now of course a lot would be involved to make this happen, such as reopening TPA crewbase for T&E and OBS. Reopen TPA mechanical facility, and some rescheduling and bargaining with CSX for track time, and restaffing of stations, and not to mention baggage situations as well. Many other numerous situations would need to be resolved, too. But in my opinion this kind of arrangment could happen if Amtrak really put their mind to it. Oh and I didn't mention the benefits to the long distance passenger if Amtrak were to return sleepers to the "Palmetto" as well as return to basics and keep TPA a key metropolitan area on their route. There a lot of new cruise lines being based down there in TPA area. Of course we all know this means money!!!! I am rambling......out...... :lol: