One complaint I have about Amtrak that is NOT a direct symptom of underfunding is the attitude about communicating delays and cancellations. I was planning a New Orleans trip much of the late summer and into the fall, and got as far as pricing the train and hotels for a few different itineraries. For various, non-railroad-related reasons, that trip isn't going to happen . . . but I just noticed in my NARP newsletter that I wouldn't have been going, anyway (at least not by train). All of my southbound possibilities have been canceled, account NS trackwork.
I went to the Amtrak website and saw nothing on the front page, other than the Pacific Northwest update. Eventually, when I tried booking the fare (just as a test), it gave me the trackwork notice. What, exactly, is to be gained by treating these things like military secrets? Why not have them on the front page, so people planning to use the service can at least have a shot at planning around it? They did the same thing with the Auto-Train cancellations some months ago, only posting the "service restored" notice on the front page. Are they afraid of putting out a bad impression on the website? I think the BAD P.R. experienced when Amtrak nonchalantly mentions to someone planning a trip for months that they're not going (often after most cheap flights are sold out) would more than balance this out.
To be fair, I'll give a big thumbs down to NS as well. I cannot quite recall when I stopped looking into the trip, but I think it was right around Thanksgiving. Amtrak would have let me book that trip right up until about that time . . . doesn't seem like much notice to me. I don't understand why a project of this magnitude, if it can't be accomplished with one Amtrak per day using the line, cannot be scheduled further in advance. Does anyone know when it was announced?
JPS
I went to the Amtrak website and saw nothing on the front page, other than the Pacific Northwest update. Eventually, when I tried booking the fare (just as a test), it gave me the trackwork notice. What, exactly, is to be gained by treating these things like military secrets? Why not have them on the front page, so people planning to use the service can at least have a shot at planning around it? They did the same thing with the Auto-Train cancellations some months ago, only posting the "service restored" notice on the front page. Are they afraid of putting out a bad impression on the website? I think the BAD P.R. experienced when Amtrak nonchalantly mentions to someone planning a trip for months that they're not going (often after most cheap flights are sold out) would more than balance this out.
To be fair, I'll give a big thumbs down to NS as well. I cannot quite recall when I stopped looking into the trip, but I think it was right around Thanksgiving. Amtrak would have let me book that trip right up until about that time . . . doesn't seem like much notice to me. I don't understand why a project of this magnitude, if it can't be accomplished with one Amtrak per day using the line, cannot be scheduled further in advance. Does anyone know when it was announced?
JPS