i would say so, unless you can come up with a model number or design.Does the Wikipedia entry for the P42 need to be corrected then?
This thread on Railroad.net suggests EMD did have something on the drawing boards, though it didn't get to prototype stage.i would say so, unless you can come up with a model number or design.Does the Wikipedia entry for the P42 need to be corrected then?
When those things were out and about (there were 2 demo engines, IIRC) they acquired the railfan nickname of "Winnebagos"First of all, very interesting thread Oldsmoboi. Thanks for starting it!
Second, that is one ugly loco!
We should be so lucky!Are you guys sure? I heard these are photos of the proposed engine prototype:
Where did you get photos of the penthouse suite on the left?We should be so lucky!Are you guys sure? I heard these are photos of the proposed engine prototype:
Dave, if that is the penthouse suite on the left, is the photo on the right your 'man about town' transportation? :unsure: :lol:Where did you get photos of the penthouse suite on the left?We should be so lucky!Are you guys sure? I heard these are photos of the proposed engine prototype:
Who leaked it?
Yes, but their development was not necessarily tied to an Amtrak order even though the timing lines up. I followed their development quite closely back then since they were the first serious AC drive development from the ground up in the US. Many did think that is what Amtrak would order, but they did not even meet one of the basic requirements in the Amtrak RFP which was that the engines must fit through the New York tunnels. F69's were too tall. For that matter the first engines that Amtrak acquired on almost an emergency basis from GE were not capable of fitting in those tunnels either. In addition the F69s proved to be particularly unreliable too.Well they were built in June 1989 and loaned to Amtrak in 1990... so that's right in the timeline of testing of the Genesis which GE started building in 1992.
Enter your email address to join: