seat38a
Engineer
Ok, I'm going to probably get flamed for this but, "Why is it wrong for Amtrak to charge a price that covers its cost and make a profit?"
Because no passenger carrying rail line does.Ok, I'm going to probably get flamed for this but, "Why is it wrong for Amtrak to charge a price that covers its cost and make a profit?"
Amtrak is not meant to be bargain basement travel, especially for an extremely lengthy and convoluted trip. Given that round trip flights can be had for $192 for this trip while taking only 6 hours (including layover), it would be absolutely insane to try and pretend that Amtrak ought to be cheaper.Message to some of you. Not everyone is rich. Not everyone has a Mercedes. And not everyone even has a house. For some people the cost of Amtrak is expensive, especially when you consider all the time involved where the person can't work and can't get paid. America is quickly turning into the land of the haves and have nots. I'm sorry Amtrak is following the same model.
SNCF, Renfe, DB Bahn, Taiwan HSR, the various JRs, China Rail, and others would like to have a word with you regarding your misapprehensions.Because no passenger carrying rail line does.Ok, I'm going to probably get flamed for this but, "Why is it wrong for Amtrak to charge a price that covers its cost and make a profit?"
Don't confuse me by asking for facts!I asked you for a cite on that, when you roll in capital spending (both infrastructure and rolling stock).
I'm still waiting.
It's in their annual reports. Perfectly googleable.I asked you for a cite on that, when you roll in capital spending (both infrastructure and rolling stock).
I'm still waiting.
^ Just to be clear, the entry I'm quoting above was NOT written or posted by me. I'm not sure if I should be flattered or insulted by the presence of a doppelganger. Anybody else ever have this happen? Seems to be a first for me. Or at least I hope it's the first time.Message to some of you. Not everyone is rich. Not everyone has a Mercedes. And not everyone even has a house. For some people the cost of Amtrak is expensive, especially when you consider all the time involved where the person can't work and can't get paid. America is quickly turning into the land of the haves and have nots. I'm sorry Amtrak is following the same model.
Thanks, that's super helpful.It's in their annual reports. Perfectly googleable.I asked you for a cite on that, when you roll in capital spending (both infrastructure and rolling stock).
I'm still waiting.
Hopefully you reported this to the Admins/Moderators Chris! I think there's a way they can trace phoney posts like this??? No excuse for a coward to hide behind someone else's ID!!!^ Just to be clear, the entry I'm quoting above was NOT written or posted by me. I'm not sure if I should be flattered or insulted by the presence of a doppelganger. Anybody else ever have this happen? Seems to be a first for me. Or at least I hope it's the first time.Message to some of you. Not everyone is rich. Not everyone has a Mercedes. And not everyone even has a house. For some people the cost of Amtrak is expensive, especially when you consider all the time involved where the person can't work and can't get paid. America is quickly turning into the land of the haves and have nots. I'm sorry Amtrak is following the same model.
Oh, THAT. Eastern train tickets cost twice as much per mile as western trains, because demand is twice as high. This will only be fixed when we get twice as much rolling stock in the east.Los Angeles to Chicago on the Southwest Chief, about 43 hours, is only $212 tomorrow for coach one way. Looking at fares a few months out I see it at $169 one way. So I can see how a trip two thirds that distance costing more might be questioned a bit.
Google is not a source. If you're making a claim that's perfectly Googleable, just provide the main source supporting your claim, instead of just saying it exists so go find it.It's in their annual reports. Perfectly googleable.I asked you for a cite on that, when you roll in capital spending (both infrastructure and rolling stock).
I'm still waiting.
I have far better things to do with my life than go on a link bonanza for a perfectly absurd claim, things like working on actual rail advocacy projects.Google is not a source. If you're making a claim that's perfectly Googleable, just provide the main source supporting your claim, instead of just saying it exists so go find it.It's in their annual reports. Perfectly googleable.I asked you for a cite on that, when you roll in capital spending (both infrastructure and rolling stock).
I'm still waiting.
But I thought it was "perfectly Googleable." You're the one making the claim that there are many passenger railroads that make money, so back it up with actual linked sources. I assume that you've looked at them before, since you're making the claim that these passenger rail services make money after capital expenses.I have far better things to do with my life than go on a link bonanza for a perfectly absurd claim, things like working on actual rail advocacy projects.Google is not a source. If you're making a claim that's perfectly Googleable, just provide the main source supporting your claim, instead of just saying it exists so go find it.It's in their annual reports. Perfectly googleable.I asked you for a cite on that, when you roll in capital spending (both infrastructure and rolling stock).
I'm still waiting.
SNCF, Renfe, DB Bahn, Taiwan HSR, the various JRs, China Rail, and others would like to have a word with you regarding your misapprehensions.Because no passenger carrying rail line does.Ok, I'm going to probably get flamed for this but, "Why is it wrong for Amtrak to charge a price that covers its cost and make a profit?"
Well it's state-owned and they operate both France's passenger and freight railroads. Freight is where the money's at. We all know that.SNCF (Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français; "National society of French railways" or "French National Railway Company") is France's national state-owned railway company and manages the rail traffic in France and the Principality of Monaco. SNCF operates the country's national rail services, including the TGV, France's high-speed rail network. Its functions include operation of railway services for passengers and freight, and maintenance and signalling of rail infrastructure owned by Réseau Ferré de France (RFF).
Also state-owned and operates both passenger and freight.Renfe Operadora (Spanish pronunciation: [ˈrenfe opeɾaˈðoɾa]) is the state-owned company which operates freight and passenger trains on the 1668-mm "Iberian gauge", 1435-mm "European gauge" and 1000-mm "Metre Gauge" networks of the Spanish national railway infrastructure company ADIF (Administrador de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias—Railway Infrastructure Administration).
The majority shareholder is the Republic of Germany and again DB Bahn is not a passengers only railroad.Deutsche Bahn AG (DB AG, DBAG or DB) is the German railway company, a private joint-stock company (AG) with the Federal Republic of Germany being its majority shareholder[2] with its headquarters in Berlin.[3] Deutsche Bahn describes itself as the second-largest transport company in the world, after the German postal and logistics company Deutsche Post / DHL, and is the largest railway operator and infrastructure owner in Europe. It carries about two billion passengers each year.
Deutsche Bahn (literally "German Railway" in German) came into existence in 1994 as the successor to the former state railways of Germany, the Deutsche Bundesbahn of West Germany and the Deutsche Reichsbahn of East Germany.[4] It also gained ownership of former railway assets in West Berlin held by the Verwaltung des ehemaligen Reichsbahnvermögens.
That quote sure does sound like the German taxpayers subsidize heavily the DB.In December 2007, DB reorganised again, bringing all passenger services into its DB Bahn arm, logistics under DB Schenker and infrastructure and operations under DB Netze.
The DB is owned by the Federal Republic. By the Constitution, the Federal Republic is required to retain (directly or indirectly) a majority of the infrastructure (the present DB Netze) stocks.
Japan has roughly half the population of the US living within an area similar in size to California. Japan's construction industry has been massively subsidized by taxpayers for decades, including projects involving passenger rail. Not every line gets new equipment on a regular basis. Not to mention that millions of Japanese people don't even own a private vehicle and are extremely comfortable with (and dependent on) the passenger rail network. These are just a few of the factors that make a direct comparison with Amtrak's finances difficult.Funny how Japan's JR system is omitted as is India Rail. Both are private and both turn profit (though I think IR is in a bit of a pickle as they can't raise rates without mass protests). Here is JR East's latest financial report: http://www.jreast.co.jp/e/investor/pdf/2014_presentation.pdf (It's a PDF for those of you who want to know beforehand) I will concede that JR was essentially "given" the infrastructure that they are utilizing back in 1986 when they were privatized. However, they are still taking on the debt that was left over from JNR. Rather than the US Government spending $1 Bil per year subsidizing Amtrak's debt, JR pays close to that back to the government! They also seem to get shiny new equipment every 10 years or so...
just going to jump in and say I agree..rail service used to be a profitable business (and don't bring up yea, so did being a Blacksmith), and I think it still could be. Now that I jumped in I'm jumping out and running.Ok, I'm going to probably get flamed for this but, "Why is it wrong for Amtrak to charge a price that covers its cost and make a profit?"
I am sure everyone in India will be very surprised to learn that Indian Railways is private, specially this week, when the Railway Minister just presented the Railway Budget to the Parliament for approval on Tuesday.Funny how Japan's JR system is omitted as is India Rail. Both are private and both turn profit (though I think IR is in a bit of a pickle as they can't raise rates without mass protests).
All wonderful information, but irrelevant. The statement was that NO RAILROAD MAKES MONEY. It's a false statement.Japan has roughly half the population of the US living within an area similar in size to California. Japan's construction industry has been massively subsidized by taxpayers for decades, including projects involving passenger rail. Not every line gets new equipment on a regular basis. Not to mention that millions of Japanese people don't even own a private vehicle and are extremely comfortable with (and dependent on) the passenger rail network. These are just a few of the factors that make a direct comparison with Amtrak's finances difficult.Funny how Japan's JR system is omitted as is India Rail. Both are private and both turn profit (though I think IR is in a bit of a pickle as they can't raise rates without mass protests). Here is JR East's latest financial report: http://www.jreast.co.jp/e/investor/pdf/2014_presentation.pdf (It's a PDF for those of you who want to know beforehand) I will concede that JR was essentially "given" the infrastructure that they are utilizing back in 1986 when they were privatized. However, they are still taking on the debt that was left over from JNR. Rather than the US Government spending $1 Bil per year subsidizing Amtrak's debt, JR pays close to that back to the government! They also seem to get shiny new equipment every 10 years or so...
Enter your email address to join: