The charlatan Lou Dobbs will be talking about the impending proxy battle on his CNN soapbox.
Thank you. I thought I was alone in thinking that.Plus the name of the outfit "children's investment fund" is off putting. Its pretentiousness just screams, "we are sleaze."
Saw it yesterday. You seem to be over reacting. He actually sounded quite coherent. Usually I don't watch the guy. Anybody in disagreement with the New York Times can't be all wrong. I consider the NYT only a small step above the North Korean Central News agency for accuracy.Did anybody actually view the segment?
The NYT appears to be one of those things that people either swear by or swear at. No notiicble number in the middle ground. You have a right ot your viewpoint, and it may even be correct when it comes to events that occur within 50 miles of Manhattan Island. Otherwise, I tend to regard it as a fairly fact free source of near propoganda on most issues. There is little I have seen on the occasions when I do look at something in it that would make me see any need to change an opinion I have held since first becoming acquainted with it as a teen in the late 1950's.The New York Times is almost always accurate. Skimmy, and written unknowledgably sometimes, but accurate.
Enter your email address to join: