Your complaint only sounds odd because it uses vague undefined criteria, because it lacks any explanation for whatever context you're envisioning, and fails to name even a single project you think is a bigger success from start to finish.As odd as it sounds, in this context $40 billion over 100 years is hardly a thundering success. You're basically making all of your profit on the back end. This isn't to speak ill of the project; this analysis just doesn't come to much in my mind, that's all.
Ok, here's what I'm saying (and FWIW I meant to add more but forgot to):Your complaint only sounds odd because it uses vague undefined criteria, because it lacks any explanation for whatever context you're envisioning, and fails to name even a single project you think is a bigger success from start to finish.As odd as it sounds, in this context $40 billion over 100 years is hardly a thundering success. You're basically making all of your profit on the back end. This isn't to speak ill of the project; this analysis just doesn't come to much in my mind, that's all.
Enter your email address to join: