Agree that the Metra/UP line is the better choice. I could be mistaken, but I recall that the plan started on the Metra/UP line, as it had more support from on-line communities, then the IDOT study recommended going with the CN line and that was the assumption for the last couple years. Now we're back to the Metra/UP line. Although, in the press release you linked to (the $60 million press release) it refers to a "new station in South Elgin" - wasn't a South Elgin station part of the CN line plan? The $223 million press release refers to using the existing Elgin Metra station.Convoluted it may be but I'm a firm believer that "all's well that ends well" and the Metra-UP route is IMHO a definite improvement over the all-CN route. Not only will it use existing passenger-speed tracks Chicago-Elgin, use the existing Elgin station, and allow for Huntley and Belvidere stops as mentioned, it would allow the possibility of special stops for events at the Illinois Railway Museum adjoining the UP line.
I was always unclear why IDOT had ever given serious consideration (in contrast to listing it as an alternative in the study and then shooting it down) to the CN route. For the Quad Cities service, they analyzed an all-IAIS (nee RI) route alongside the BNSF-IAIS routing but IIRC never gave it serious weight in light of the obvious relative advantage of the BNSF routing.
I'm also a bit puzzled by the reference to $223 million in the linked press release when the other State press release gives a (IMHO more realistic) figure of $60 million. Of course, it also refers to serving DuPage county, where this line will pass through the northeast corner without stopping unless another now-Metra stop (say, Bensenville) is added. :wacko:
$60 million, $223 million, new South Elgin station, existing Elgin station - confusion continues I guess.