An editorial article from the Sacramento Bee newspaper asks the question about California's HSR ambitions when related to the 1956 Federal-Aid Highway Act (also known as the piece of legislation that gave birth to our interstate system.)
The Government Accountability Office injected a sense of realism into the high-speed rail debate, detailing in its March 28 report just how large infrastructure projects of this kind work. But the naysayers led by House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, and Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Turlock, don't seem to be listening.
The SacBee's official stance on the issue:A major issue, it turns out, is post-2010 congressional opposition. As the GAO notes, the Obama administration, as well as the governor, Legislature and voters of California, has committed funding to the project. But sustained congressional support for additional funds is "one of the biggest challenges to completing this project."
McCarthy was quick to prove the point. As soon as the report came out, he issued a statement that he was "developing legislation to stop more hard-earned taxpayer dollars from being wasted on California high-speed rail." Ditto for Denham.
Read more HERE.It is perfectly suitable for members of Congress to press for improvements to the high-speed rail project. Repeatedly attempting to kill it makes no sense.
"McCarthy and Denham should stop Republicans in the nation's capital from treating the San Joaquin Valley as "nowheresville" – though its eight counties are home to 4 million people, a population larger than half of the states in the nation."
– Dec. 14, 2012