johnny.menhennet
Conductor
We have had a lot of discussions recently about what train services would be beneficial or what we would like to have, so I had a question for clash's sake. If you were in charge of determining the one route that had to be cut from the system entirely, so not just reduce frequency, but completely eliminate, what would it be? I know that this is extremely subjective, but that's ok. I will let you guys gauge how you determine this, whether it is ridership, redundancy in the system, losses, etc., as long as you explain it. Personally, I do not have nearly as much experience as many of you others when it comes to the actual logistics of the network and other things, and I don't actually have a route in mind. I was just wondering's everybody's opinions.
BTW I don't want any "Crescent south of Atlanta" or "EB west of St. Paul," I'm looking for a full route elimination and reasons. Thanks for your answers. I just think that this will be pretty interesting.
BTW I don't want any "Crescent south of Atlanta" or "EB west of St. Paul," I'm looking for a full route elimination and reasons. Thanks for your answers. I just think that this will be pretty interesting.