ACS-64 Heads Up

shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
Advertise with us
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Funny that my old zip code had 666 @ the end, and some folks seemed uncomfortable, including call center reps, when I would tell them my zip code!

Other funny number phobias are the old #13 jinx, lots of hotels don't have a 13th Floor, no #13 Rooms and in Casinos there were no #13 tables, but #13 was on the Roulette table and wheel! ( Oh those French!)
 
I went to a Catholic high school in the 1960's which had the address 666. A number of years later, after a bunch of horror films came out featuring 666's alleged connection to the devil, the address was changed to 650.
 
I want to say that when Amtrak operated trains to Atlantic City they briefly had one numbered 666. But I'd have check old timetables to make sure.
 
Agent said:
I was surprised by AMTK 659 on Amtrak #6(26) this morning at Agency, Iowa. I was also surprised by the sight of a second sightseer lounge, and I was surprised by the private cars Chapel Hill and Adirondack Club.

This means there are only ten Sprinters left, right?
Click to expand...
Whether they skip #666 or not in the engine numbering sequence, this means that there only 10 ACS-64s left to ship from the Siemens plant. At the current delivery rate, the last one could be shipped by the end of the calendar year. Which in turns means the AEM-7s could be gone from revenue service by early Spring.
 
I received an email from a yahoo group from an Amtrak employee saying that Amtrak is planning on pulling some of the HHP-8's out of storage for a potential return to service. If they skip 666, then I guess we'll see a 670
 
Amtrak172 said:
I received an email from a yahoo group from an Amtrak employee saying that Amtrak is planning on pulling some of the HHP-8's out of storage for a potential return to service. If they skip 666, then I guess we'll see a 670
Click to expand...
They have to maintain the HHP-8s in roadworthy condition until the lease expires. So they will have to be renumbered (and are being renumbered) even though there are no real plans to use them for anything at present.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HHPs already renumbered 680 - 694. It may be the lease requires them to demonstrate that they are still roaadwoorthy every so often. Don't make too much of it. Amtrak would rather use AEM-7 ACs if necessary..
 
west point said:
HHPs already renumbered 680 - 694. It may be the lease requires them to demonstrate that they are still roaadwoorthy every so often. Don't make too much of it. Amtrak would rather use AEM-7 ACs if necessary..
Click to expand...
Yep. That's the impression I have too.
 
jis said:
Amtrak172 said:
I received an email from a yahoo group from an Amtrak employee saying that Amtrak is planning on pulling some of the HHP-8's out of storage for a potential return to service. If they skip 666, then I guess we'll see a 670
Click to expand...
They have to maintain the HHP-8s in roadworthy condition until the lease expires. So they will have to be renumbered (and are being renumbered) even though there are no real plans to use them for anything at present.
Click to expand...
You would think some sort of deal could be arranged with Bombardier, to avoid literally throwing money away maintaining locomotives which will never be used again. Even upon lease expiration, it's hard to see a situation where these units are sold to another carrier; Their likely career post-Amtrak is the scrappers torch, so there is nothing to be gained by keeping them in running order.
 
west point said:
HHPs already renumbered 680 - 694. It may be the lease requires them to demonstrate that they are still roaadwoorthy every so often. Don't make too much of it. Amtrak would rather use AEM-7 ACs if necessary..
Click to expand...
That's exactly what I was thinking when I heard about this.
 
The goal is to have all ACS-64s up and running by early Spring. I believe the AEM-7s ACs will be stored prior to that date as we are down to 17. I suspect you will see a lease buyout for the HHP-8s but until then, they must maintained accordingly..
 
Bob Dylan said:
Funny that my old zip code had 666 @ the end, and some folks seemed uncomfortable, including call center reps, when I would tell them my zip code!

Other funny number phobias are the old #13 jinx, lots of hotels don't have a 13th Floor, no #13 Rooms and in Casinos there were no #13 tables, but #13 was on the Roulette table and wheel! ( Oh those French!)
Click to expand...
I want to have a talk with CSX. I don't remember quite what town it is in, but it's in between WAS and RVR. There is a CSX defective equipment detector which announces it's at milepost 66.6. I'm not that superstitious, but I thought it was weird. Why not round it down to 66.5, or just leave it at 66? Talked to one of the conductor crews last week, and they said they thought the same thing. Oddly enough, it was train 67 I was working, which returns as, of course, 66.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amtrak #6(03) was just sixteen minutes late this morning when it came through the countryside east of Batavia, Iowa with AMTK 660 in what might the last time an ACS-64 is coupled to a heritage baggage car. I believe this one was AMTK 1702, which hasn't even been updated from the Phase IV scheme. This California Zephyr was running on the left track to pass the freight train seen in the background.

 
Yes, it was AMTK 661. It was just seven minutes late when the California Zephyr left Ottumwa, Iowa. It went through the yard passing one locomotive moving cars around and another locomotive that was on top of a flatcar. That one is on its way to the museum in Eldon, Iowa.

 

Latest posts

Back
Top