If you're talking about me June, there's no reason to be coy about it.
Yes, if someone makes a factually incorrect statement that I have the data to refute, I'm going to refute it. I love going through data and distilling it down to figure out what we can learn from it. The thread from this morning where someone asked about CZ timekeeping over the winter is a perfect example of that. I've got time data for every train arriving at every station in Amtrak's system at my disposal, and have written some software tools to go through that data and provide concrete answers to questions like that. It's something that I do for my job and enjoy greatly.
Telling someone their facts are wrong doesn't have to drive a major conniption fit, though. When I'm incorrect (and believe me, it happens), I do my best to be gracious about it, thank the person for the correction and file it away as a new fact learned without taking it personally.
When it comes to making value judgements based on that data, I don't really have a dog in that fight. My general take is that Amtrak has better data than any of us do, and unless demonstrated otherwise, is competent enough to make use of that data. I think that trying to piece together the scant data that we get from Amtrak and try to pretend like that makes us railfans more qualified to run the railroad is just silly. My only reason for even entering this thread was that I saw a claim that looked interesting and verifiable (timekeeping of train #1 drives employees in Houston to work massive amounts of overtime). I got curious, looked at the data and saw that it didn't support that conclusion.
Anyhow, that's probably far more than anyone is interested in knowing, but that's my thought process.